...
首页> 外文期刊>Pesticide science >Some physicochemical factors influencing foliar uptake enhancement of glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) by polyoxyethylene surfactants
【24h】

Some physicochemical factors influencing foliar uptake enhancement of glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) by polyoxyethylene surfactants

机译:影响聚氧乙烯表面活性剂增强草甘膦单异丙基铵叶面吸收的一些理化因素

获取原文

摘要

AbstractStructure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) and field bean (Vicia fabaL.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions. Candidate surfactants had mean molar ethylene oxide (EO) contents ranging from 5 to 20 and were added at concentrations varying from 0·2 to 10 g litre−‐1to 14Cglyphosate formulations in acetone–water. Rates and total amounts of herbicide uptake fromc. 0·2–μl droplet applications of formulations to leaves were influenced by surfactant EO content, surfactant hydrophobe composition, surfactant concentration, glyphosate concentration and plant species, in a complex manner. Surfactant effects were most pronounced at 0·5 g acid equivalent (a.e.) glyphosate litre−‐1where, for both target species, surfactants of high EO content (15–20) were most effective at enhancing herbicide uptake: surfactants of lower EO content (5–10) frequently reduced, or failed to improve, glyphosate absorption. Whereas, at optimal EO content, AM surfactants caused greatest uptake enhancement on wheat, A surfactants gave the best overall performance on field bean; NP surfactants were generally the least efficient class of adjuvants on both species. Threshold concentrations of surfactants needed to increase glyphosate uptake were much higher in field bean than wheat (c.2 g litre−‐1and<1 g litre−‐1, respectively); less herbicide was taken up by both species at high AM surfactant concentrations. At 5 and 10 g a.e. glyphosate litre−‐1, there were substantial increases in herbicide absorption and surfactant addition could cause effects on uptake that were different from those observed at lower herbicide doses. In particular, the influence of EO content on glyphosate uptake was now much less marked in both species, especially with AM surfactants. The fundamental importance of glyphosate concentration for its uptake was further emphasised by experiments using formulations with constant a.i./surfactant weight ratios. Any increased foliar penetration resulting from inclusion of surfactants in 0·5 g litre−‐114Cglyphosate formulations gave concomitant increases in the amounts of radiolabel that were translocated away from the site of application. At these low herbicide doses, translocation of absorbed 14Cglyphosate in wheat wasc.twice that in field bean; surfactant addition to the formulation did not increase the proportion transported in wheat b
机译:摘要以小麦(Triticum aestivumL.)和田豆(Vicia fabaL.)为研究对象,研究了商用聚氧乙烯伯脂肪醇(A)、壬基酚(NP)、伯脂肪胺(AM)表面活性剂与除草剂草甘膦单异丙基铵的结构-浓度-叶面吸收增强关系。候选表面活性剂的平均摩尔环氧乙烷 (EO) 含量范围为 5 至 20,在丙酮-水中添加浓度为 0.2 至 10 g 升至 [14C] 草甘膦配方。除草剂吸收率和总量。0·2–μl液滴应用于叶片的配方受表面活性剂EO含量、表面活性剂疏水成分、表面活性剂浓度、草甘膦浓度和植物种类的复杂影响。表面活性剂效应在0·5克酸当量(a.e.)草甘膦升时最为明显,对于两种目标物种,高EO含量(15-20)的表面活性剂在提高除草剂吸收方面最有效:EO含量较低(5-10)的表面活性剂经常减少或未能改善草甘膦的吸收。在EO含量最佳时,AM表面活性剂对小麦的吸收增强最大,A表面活性剂对田间豆类的综合性能最好;NP表面活性剂通常是两种物质上效率最低的一类助剂。增加草甘膦吸收所需的表面活性剂阈值浓度在田间豆类中远高于小麦(分别为约2克升--1和<1克-1升-1);在AM表面活性剂浓度较高的情况下,两个物种对除草剂的吸收量都较少。在5克和10克草甘膦升--1时,除草剂的吸收量显著增加,表面活性剂的添加可能对吸收产生的影响,这与在较低除草剂剂量下观察到的影响不同。特别是,环氧乙烷含量对草甘膦吸收的影响现在在这两个物种中都不那么明显,尤其是AM表面活性剂。使用具有恒定人工智能/表面活性剂重量比的配方的实验进一步强调了草甘膦浓度对其吸收的根本重要性。在0.5 g升--1[14C]草甘膦制剂中加入表面活性剂导致的叶面渗透增加,使放射性标记物的量随之增加,这些放射性标记物的量从施用部位移位。在低除草剂量下,小麦中吸收的[14C]草甘膦的易位量是田间豆类的2倍;向配方中添加表面活性剂并没有增加小麦B中转运的比例

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号