G8 and VES-13 as screening tools for geriatric assessment and predictors of survival in older Indian patients with cancer

摘要

Background: Geriatric 8 (G8) and Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) are quick and easy-to-use screening tools, developed and validated in older patients living in North America and Europe for predicting abnormalities in the subsequent geriatric assessment. The applicability of these screening tools in older Indian patients with cancer is not known. Methods: An observational study in 308 Indian patients with cancer aged >= 60 years, who were evaluated in the Geriatric Oncology clinic at the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients underwent the G8 and VES-13 screening tools followed by a geriatric assessment. The objectives were to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the G8NES-13 screening tools to detect an abnormal geriatric assessment, to determine their association with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS)/Cancer Aging and Research Group (CARG) scores, to determine the optimal cut-off value on the G8 scale for older Indian patients with cancer, and to determine whether an abnormal G8NES-13 score was associated with shorter survival. We also aimed to assess the utility of combining the G8 and VES-13 scores to predict for an abnormal geriatric assessment and poorer survival. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the G8 (cut-off, = 3) were 34.9% and 82.4%, respectively. The appropriate abnormal G8 cut-off score was noted to be 12. Abnormal G8 (<= 14) and VES-13 scores were not associated with an abnormal subsequent geriatric assessment [p = 0.736 (G8)], while abnormal G8 (<= 14) scores did not predict for worse survival outcomes. Lowering the cut-off of the G8 score to <12 and/or combining an abnormal G8 (<12) with the VES-13 score were found to be associated with an abnormal subsequent geriatric assessment [p < 0.001 (G8), p < 0.001(G8 4- VES-13)] and predicted for worse survival. Conclusions: An abnormal G8 cut-off score < 12 is therefore appropriate in older Indian patients with cancer. G8 < 12 predicts for the presence of non-oncological vulnerabilities and shorter survival. Lowering the cutoff of G8 to 12translated to a 35% reduction in the number of patients undergoing a complete geriatric assessment. Combined with VES-13, the G8 can be reliably used to identify those patients who would benefit the most from a geriatric assessment and help in optimal resource utilization especially in busy Indian centers. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.