首页> 外文期刊>Orthodontics & craniofacial research >Skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant device for correction of Class II malocclusions-A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant device for correction of Class II malocclusions-A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:骨骼锚定抗疲劳矫正II类错颌畸形装置的系统评价与Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The use of skeletal anchorage with fixed functional appliances (FFA) has been proposed by various authors to produce skeletal changes and reduce lower incisor proclination. To compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (FFRD) with or without skeletal anchorage (miniplates and mini-implants). The electronic database PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Google Scholar along with a manual search of orthodontic journals till the year 2019. Only randomized control trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review. One controlled clinical trial (CCT) which involved FFRD was included in the review since it was a continuation of an RCT which was expanded to a CCT. Skeletal and dentoalveolar outcome data were extracted to collect study characteristics. After evaluating risk of bias, the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95 confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Three RCTs and one prospective CCT were evaluated. The analysis included data from 116 Class II subjects (58) treated with FFA along with skeletal anchorage and (58) treated with FFA. There were no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mandibular length changes (Pvalue = .10) and SNB angle changes (Pvalue = .22). With respect to lower incisor inclination however, there was a significant difference between the two groups (Pvalue = .005) signifying better results with respect to skeletal anchorage. The studies reviewed provide insufficient evidence to form a conclusion regarding the effects of the use of skeletal anchorage with FFRD. The available weak evidence suggests that the use of skeletal anchorage with FFRD has no superior skeletal effects but is able to reduce proclination of the lower incisors. Control of lower incisor proclination remains the most significant advantage of skeletal reinforcement, and miniplate-anchored FFRD showed more promising results in preventing lower incisor proclination than miniscrew-anchored FFRD.
机译:多位作者建议使用带有固定功能矫治器 (FFA) 的骨骼锚固来产生骨骼变化并减少下切牙倾斜。比较有或没有骨骼锚固(迷你板和微型植入物)的 Forsus 抗疲劳装置 (FFRD) 的骨骼和牙槽效应。截至 2019 年,电子数据库 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Medline、Embase 和 Google Scholar 以及正畸期刊的手动检索。系统评价仅纳入随机对照试验(randomized control trials, RCTs)。一项涉及FFRD的对照临床试验(controlled clinical trial, CCT)被纳入本综述,因为它是RCT的延续,该RCT已扩展为CCT。提取骨骼和牙槽结局数据以收集研究特征。在评估偏倚风险后,计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。评估了3项随机对照试验和1项前瞻性CCT。该分析包括来自 116 名 II 类受试者的数据 [(58) 接受 FFA 和骨骼锚定治疗,(58) 接受 FFA 治疗]。两组在下颌长度变化(P值=.10)和SNB角变化(P值=.22)方面差异无统计学意义。然而,在下切牙倾斜方面,两组之间存在显着差异 (Pvalue = .005),表明在骨骼锚定方面有更好的结果。所评价的研究提供了足够的证据来形成关于使用骨骼锚固和FFRD的影响的结论。现有的微弱证据表明,使用骨骼锚固和FFRD没有优越的骨骼效应,但能够减少下切牙的倾斜。控制下切牙倾斜仍然是骨骼加固最显着的优势,与微型螺钉锚定的 FFRD 相比,小板锚定 FFRD 在防止下切牙倾斜方面显示出更有希望的结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号