首页> 外文期刊>applied artificial intelligence >COMPARISON OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE METHODS FOR MODELING PHARMACEUTICAL QSARS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE METHODS FOR MODELING PHARMACEUTICAL QSARS

机译:人工智能方法与制药机的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A common step in pharmaceutical development is the formation of a quantitative structure-activity relationship *(QSAR) to model an exploratory series of compounds. A QSAR generalizes how the structure (shape) of a compound relates to its biological activity. A comparative study was carried out of six artificial intelligence and traditional algorithms for modeling QSAR's: GOLEM, CART, and MS from symbolic machine learning; back-propagation from neural networks; and linear regression and nearest-neighbor from traditional statistics. Two test case problems were studied: the inhibition of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) by pyrimidines, and the inhibition of ratlmouse tumor DHFR by triazines. It was found that there was no significant statistical difference between the methods in terms of their ability to rank unseen compounds by activity. However, symbolic machine learning methods, in particular relational ones, were found to generate rules that provided insight into the stereochemistry of compound receptor interactions.
机译:药物开发的一个常见步骤是形成定量构效关系*(QSAR),以模拟一系列探索性化合物。QSAR概括了化合物的结构(形状)与其生物活性的关系。对六种人工智能和传统算法进行了比较研究,用于建模 QSAR:来自符号机器学习的 GOLEM、CART 和 MS;神经网络的反向传播;以及传统统计的线性回归和最近邻。研究了嘧啶类对大肠杆菌二氢叶酸还原酶(DHFR)的抑制和三嗪类对大肠杆菌肿瘤DHFR的抑制。结果发现,在按活性对看不见的化合物进行排名的能力方面,这些方法之间没有显着的统计学差异。然而,符号机器学习方法,特别是关系机器学习方法,被发现可以生成规则,从而深入了解化合物受体相互作用的立体化学。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号