首页> 外文期刊>The Hastings Center report >Reasonable Disagreement about Identified vs. Statistical VICTIMS
【24h】

Reasonable Disagreement about Identified vs. Statistical VICTIMS

机译:Reasonable Disagreement about Identified vs. Statistical VICTIMS

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

People tend to contribute more-and think they have stronger obligations to contribute more-to rescuing an identified victim rather than a statistical one. Indeed, they are often disposed to contribute more to rescuing a single identified victim than a greater number of statistical ones. By an "identified victim," I mean Terry Q., lying injured in the passenger seat of the wrecked automobile on the corner of Main Street and Broadway, or Jessica Mc-Clure, the child who fell into the Texas well in 1987 and whose family was sent dollar 700,000 in donations for her. We need not know their names, however, and we can accept a very minimal form of identification.1 By a "statistical victim," I mean the person who, extrapolating from traffic records, will be in a similar, serious car accident tomorrow (and may then be identified), or the children who will fall into wells next year if we do not cap them better than we did the well that trapped Jessica.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号