首页> 外文期刊>Psychiatric annals >Ethical Responsibilities of Physicians: Capital Punishment in the 21st Century
【24h】

Ethical Responsibilities of Physicians: Capital Punishment in the 21st Century

机译:Ethical Responsibilities of Physicians: Capital Punishment in the 21st Century

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The United States is in the company of only 22 other countries with the death penalty. The American Medical Association is among many medical professional organizations that prohibit the participation of physicians in the physical act of execution. Despite these clear guidelines, debate remains regarding physician involvement in various aspects of death penalty cases. This article outlines different positions that physicians and specifically forensic psychiatrists have taken on this issue. Our position is that given the overwhelming secondary duty related to their physician role-specifically to do no harmforensic psychiatrists should not use their expertise if they believe their involvement will be used for the primary purpose of obtaining a death penalty. Of necessity, forensic evaluations can do harm. But when something as extreme as death is concerned, the secondary medical duties preclude directly facilitating a person's death.

著录项

  • 来源
    《Psychiatric annals》 |2015年第12期|615-621|共7页
  • 作者单位

    NYU, Langone Med Center, New York, NY 10003 USA;

    Univ Calif Los Angeles, Semel Inst Neurosci & Human Behav, Psychiat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA;

    Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Psychiat, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类 精神病学;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号