...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain stimulation >Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs
【24h】

Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs

机译:经颅磁刺激中的电场深度-焦点权衡:50个线圈设计的仿真比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Various transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil designs are available or have been proposed. However, key coil characteristics such as electric field focality and attenuation in depth have not been adequately compared. Knowledge of the coil focality and depth characteristics can help TMS researchers and clinicians with coil selection and interpretation of TMS studies. Objective: To quantify the electric field focality and depth of penetration of various TMS coils. Methods: The electric field distributions induced by 50 TMS coils were simulated in a spherical human head model using the finite element method. For each coil design, we quantified the electric field penetration by the half-value depth, d1/2, and focality by the tangential spread, S1/2, defined as the half-value volume (V 1/2) divided by the half-value depth, S1/2 = V 1/2/d1/2. Results: The 50 TMS coils exhibit a wide range of electric field focality and depth, but all followed a depth-focality tradeoff: coils with larger half-value depth cannot be as focal as more superficial coils. The ranges of achievable d1/2 are similar between coils producing circular and figure-8 electric field patterns, ranging 1.0-3.5 cm and 0.9-3.4 cm, respectively. However, figure-8 field coils are more focal, having S1/2 as low as 5 cm2 compared to 34 cm2 for circular field coils. Conclusions: For any coil design, the ability to directly stimulate deeper brain structures is obtained at the expense of inducing wider electrical field spread. Novel coil designs should be benchmarked against comparison coils with consistent metrics such as d1/2 and S1/2.
机译:背景:各种经颅磁刺激(TMS)线圈设计是可用的或已经提出。但是,尚未充分地比较关键的线圈特性,例如电场聚焦和深度衰减。线圈聚焦和深度特性的知识可以帮助TMS研究人员和临床医生选择线圈和解释TMS研究。目的:量化各种TMS线圈的电场聚焦度和穿透深度。方法:使用有限元方法在球形人头模型中模拟了由50个TMS线圈感应的电场分布。对于每种线圈设计,我们通过半值深度d1 / 2和切向扩展S1 / 2(定义为半值体积(V 1/2)除以一半)得出的电场穿透量进行量化值深度S1 / 2 = V 1/2 / d1 / 2。结果:50个TMS线圈展现出广泛的电场聚焦和深度范围,但是所有这些都遵循深度-焦点权衡:半值深度较大的线圈无法像更多的浅层线圈那样聚焦。在产生圆形和图8电场图案的线圈之间,可达到的d1 / 2范围相似,分别为1.0-3.5 cm和0.9-3.4 cm。但是,图8励磁线圈更具焦点,S1 / 2低至5 cm2,而圆形励磁线圈的S1 / 2仅为34 cm2。结论:对于任何线圈设计,都可以直接刺激更深的大脑结构,但要以引起更宽的电场扩散为代价。新颖的线圈设计应以具有一致指标(例如d1 / 2和S1 / 2)的比较线圈为基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号