首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical Problems in Engineering: Theory, Methods and Applications >Study on Green Supply Chain Cooperation and Carbon Tax Policy considering Consumer's Behavior
【24h】

Study on Green Supply Chain Cooperation and Carbon Tax Policy considering Consumer's Behavior

机译:考虑消费者行为的绿色供应链合作与碳税政策研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Carbon tax policy has been shown to be an effective incentive for the reduction of carbon emissions, and it also profoundly influences supply chain cooperation. This paper explores the interaction between carbon taxes and green supply chain cooperation. Specifically, we analyze the impact of a carbon tax on green supply chain coordination and further optimize the carbon tax to achieve a win-win situation for both the supply chain and the environment. Because consumer's behavior has a significant impact on green product demand, we consider the problems above under two types of consumer's behavior characteristics: consumer's environmental awareness and consumer's reference behavior. A game-theoretic model is employed to describe a green supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer, combining important factors such as the carbon tax rate, green investment coefficient, and degree of reference effect. Then, we obtain the optimal carbon tax rate by balancing the total tax revenue and product greenness. A revenue-sharing contract is introduced to achieve green supply chain coordination, and the impact of the carbon tax on coordination is analyzed. The results show the following. (1) The carbon tax rate and the difference between the power of the manufacturer and retailer are the main factors determining green supply chain coordination. (2) Maximum greenness can be achieved when development costs are higher, while the maximum tax revenue is obtained when the development cost is lower, but with the loss of greenness. (3) If the power of the manufacturer is low, coordination can be achieved under the optimal carbon tax. If the power of the manufacturer is at a medium level, coordination can be achieved by increasing the carbon tax; as a result, increased greenness will be realized, but with the loss of tax revenue. However, when the power of the manufacturer is strong, coordination cannot be achieved. (4) Price reference behavior can promote supply chain coordination, but consumer's environmental awareness cannot.
机译:碳税政策已被证明是减少碳排放的有效激励措施,也深刻影响着供应链合作。本文探讨了碳税与绿色供应链合作之间的相互作用。具体而言,我们分析了碳税对绿色供应链协调的影响,并进一步优化了碳税,以实现供应链和环境的双赢。由于消费者行为对绿色产品需求有显著影响,因此我们在消费者环境意识和消费者参照行为两类行为特征下考虑上述问题。采用博弈论模型描述由制造商和零售商组成的绿色供应链,并结合碳税率、绿色投资系数和参考效应程度等重要因素。然后,我们通过平衡总税收收入和产品绿色度来获得最优的碳税率。引入收益分享契约实现绿色供应链协同,分析碳税对协同的影响。结果显示以下内容。(1)碳税率和制造商与零售商权力的差异是决定绿色供应链协同的主要因素。(2)开发成本较高时可以达到最大的绿化,而开发成本较低时可以获得最大的税收收入,但绿化度会降低。(3)如果制造商的功率较低,则可以在最优碳税下实现协调。如果制造商的电力处于中等水平,可以通过提高碳税来实现协调;结果,将实现增加的绿色,但会损失税收。但是,当制造商的力量强大时,就无法实现协调。(4)价格参考行为可以促进供应链协调,但消费者的环保意识不能。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号