首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention >Impact of β-Blockers on Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake During Exercise and Recovery in Older Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
【24h】

Impact of β-Blockers on Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake During Exercise and Recovery in Older Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

机译:Impact of β-Blockers on Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake During Exercise and Recovery in Older Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The nonsignificant differences in heart rate or oxygen uptake values in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with β-blockers or without β-blockers treatment suggest that these measures may have equal utility in functional assessment, including the prescription and design of exercise, in elderly HFpEF patients. Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the differences in oxygen uptake ( o _(2)) and heart rate (HR) (at rest, submaximal exercise, peak exercise, and recovery) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with β-blockers (BB) or without BB treatment (NBB) and to analyze the relationship between HR reserve (HR_(resv)) and peak o _(2)( o _(2peak)) in BB and NBB. Methods: A total of 174 HFpEF patients (>65 yr; BB, n = 59; NBB, n = 115) were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test to peak exertion using an incremental protocol. After 5 min of supine rest, HR and o _(2)(HR_(rest), o _(2rest)) at submaximal exercise (HR_(submax), o _(2submax)), at peak exercise (HR_(peak), o _(2peak)), at 1 min of passive recovery (HR_(rec1)), HR_(resv)(HR_(peak)? HR_(rest)), and HR recovery (HR_(recov)= HR_(peak)? HR_(rec1)) were evaluated. Results: Analysis showed that HR_(rest)(66.0 ± 12.2 vs 69.7 ± 10.6 bpm), HR_(submax)(91.7 ± 16.2 vs 98.6 ± 15.2 bpm), and HR_(rec1)(102.9 ± 18.9 vs 109.4 ± 16.9 bpm) were significantly lower ( P ≤ .05) in BB than in NBB, respectively. However, there were no significant differences ( P > .05) between the BB and the NBB for HR_(peak), HR_(resv), HR_(recov), o _(2rest), o _(2submax), and o _(2peak). A significant relationship was found between HR_(resv)and o _(2peak)values in both groups (BB, r = 0.52; NBB, r = 0.49, P < .001). Conclusions: The nonsignificant differences in HR_(peak), HR_(resv), HR_(recov), or o _(2)values between BB and NBB HFpEF patients, along with significant correlation between HR_(resv)and o _(2peak), suggest that these measures may have equal utility in prognostic and functional assessment as well as clinical applications, including the prescription of exercise, in elderly HFpEF patients.

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号