首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of health economics: HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care >Examining unpriced risk heterogeneity in the Dutch health insurance market
【24h】

Examining unpriced risk heterogeneity in the Dutch health insurance market

机译:研究荷兰健康保险市场的未定价风险异质性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A major challenge in regulated health insurance markets is to mitigate risk selection potential. Risk selection can occur in the presence of unpriced risk heterogeneity, which refers to predictable variation in health care spending not reflected in either premiums by insurers or risk equalization payments. This paper examines unpriced risk heterogeneity within risk groups distinguished by the sophisticated Dutch risk equalization model of 2016. Our strategy is to combine the administrative dataset used for estimation of the risk equalization model (n=16.9 million) with information derived from a large health survey (n=387k). The survey information allows for explaining and predicting residual spending of the risk equalization model. Based on the predicted residual spending, two metrics are used to indicate unpriced risk heterogeneity at the individual level and at the level of certain (risk) groups: the correlation coefficient between residual spending and predicted residual spending, and the mean absolute value of predicted residual spending. The analyses yield three main findings: (1) the health survey information is able to explain some residual spending of the risk equalization model, (2) unpriced risk heterogeneity exists both in morbidity and in non-morbidity groups, and (3) unpriced risk heterogeneity increases with predicted spending by the risk equalization model. These findings imply that the sophisticated Dutch risk equalization model does not completely remove unpriced risk heterogeneity. Further improvement of the model should focus on broadening and refining the current set of morbidity-based risk adjusters.
机译:受监管的健康保险市场的一个主要挑战是降低风险选择的可能性。风险选择可能发生在存在未定价的风险异质性的情况下,这是指医疗保健支出的可预测变化,未反映在保险公司的保费或风险均衡支付中。本文研究了风险组内未定价的风险异质性,该风险组以2016年复杂的荷兰风险均衡模型为特征。我们的策略是将用于估计风险均衡模型(n=1690万)的行政数据集与来自大型健康调查的信息(n=387k)相结合。调查信息可用于解释和预测风险均衡模型的剩余支出。基于预测的剩余支出,使用两个指标来表示个体层面和某些(风险)群体层面的未定价风险异质性:剩余支出与预测剩余支出之间的相关系数,以及预测剩余支出的平均绝对值。分析得出三个主要发现:(1)健康调查信息能够解释风险均衡模型的一些剩余支出,(2)发病率和非发病率组都存在未定价的风险异质性,以及(3)未定价的风险异质性随着风险均衡模型的预测支出而增加。这些发现表明,复杂的荷兰风险均衡模型并不能完全消除未定价的风险异质性。该模型的进一步改进应侧重于扩大和完善目前基于发病率的风险调整器。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号