Super-stable metallotetraphenylporphyrins

摘要

Mendeleev Communications Electronic Version, Issue 6, 1997 (pp. 213–252) Super-stable metallotetraphenylporphyrins Tatyana N. Lomova,* Elena Yu. Tulaeva, Elena G. Mozhzhukhina and Maria E. Klyueva Institute of Non-Aqueous Solution Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 153045 Ivanovo, Russian Federation. Fax: + 7 0932 37 8509 Super-stable porphyrin complexes [germanium(IV) and tin(IV)tetraphenylporphyrins], precipitated from concentrated sulfuric acid poured onto ice, have been discovered, together with stable metallophthalocyanines, and their stability is characterised and the dissociation mechanism in proton donor solvents investigated.It is known that stable metallophthalocyanines crystallize out when their sulfuric acid solutions are poured onto ice. This is used as a method of high purification from admixtures after template synthesis of the complexes.1 Metalloporphyrins with composition MP (P = porphyrin dianion, M = doubly-charged metal cation) are less stable2–4 and undergo destruction, being dissolved in concentrated H2SO4.Before any detailed investigations into the stability of acidoporphyrin complexes of highly charged metal cations of composition (X)n–2MP (X = single-charged acido ligand) appeared it had been assumed5 that all metalloporphyrins were unstable in sulfuric acid.It was shown6–8 that complexes of tetraphenylporphin (X)n–2MTPP and O=VOEP with covalent bonding acidoligands X in the first coordination sphere and in some cases complexes with composition MP do not undergo destruction in concentrated H2SO4.However, it was difficult to identify the complexes in the sulfuric acid solution because they form an H-associate (X)n–2MTPP···H+ Solv with an electronic absorption spectrum possessing two wide bands at 540 and 700 nm; this differs from the usual spectra of the metalloporphyrin solutions. This applies to (X)MnTPP, (X)FeTPP, O=TiTPP, (Cl)InTPP, (AcO)GaTPP and several of their functional derivatives. Now a qualitative reaction which shows the dissociation process of metalloporphyrins in H2SO4 or its absence has been found.9 An attempt to crystallize metalloporphyrin bonding into the Hassociate leads to dissociation of the complex in all cases.In this communication new quantitative data about the existence of metalloporphyrins, which are stable in hot (398 K) concentrated sulfuric acid in the molecular form (in contrast to the H-associate), and which can be recrystallized from sulfuric acid solutions similar to stable metallophthalocyanines, are presented.These are (dichlorine)germaniumtetraphenylporphin (Cl)2GeTPP and (dichlorine)tintetraphenylporphin (Cl)2SnTPP. (Cl)2GeTPP was obtained as described in ref. 10 by reaction of the complex formation of H2TPP with GeCl4 in quinoline at 510 K under a nitrogen atmosphere.(Cl)2SnTPP was obtained as described in ref. 11 by an analogous reaction of H2TPP with SnCl2 in boiling dimethylformamide. The tin complex was purified by chromatography on an Al2O3 column using CHCl3 and the germanium complex using CHCl3 and then diethyl ether. UV/VIS spectra of the complexes coincide with literature data12,13 lmax/nm (lg e): 402 (sh.), 423 (5.76), 485 (sh.), 516 (3.49), 554 (4.29), 592 (3.83) and 406 (4.63), 428 (5.83), 490 (sh.), 522 (3.56), 561 (4.34), 601 (4.13) for germanium and tin complexes in CHCl3, respectively.The complexes are partially dissolved in concentrated H2SO4, in which their solutions are rose in colour in contrast to the brown solution in case of the H-associate formation. The general character of their visible spectra in sulfuric acid is the same as in organic solvents, but the absorption maxima have lower wavelengths lmax/nm: 516, 545, 572 and 510, 547, 586 for the germanium and tin complexes, respectively. After reprecipitation of the germanium and tin complexes from sulfuric acid onto ice their spectra do not change.(Cl)2MTPP undergoes dissociation [reaction (1)] at a spectrophotometrically measured rate only in media with a maximum proton donor particles content: in H2SO4 at a concentration near 100% over 340 K. In 83–97% sulfuric acid where stable metallophthalocyanines dissociate slowly the tetraphenylporphyrin complexes with Sn and Ge remain unchanged for a long time.This defines the metalloporphyrins as complexes with unsurpassed kinetic stability in solution. Solvent H2SO4–H2O with acid content 99.94–99.98% was prepared by the weight method from 100% H2SO4 and H2SO4 with definite concentration. Experimental constants of the dissociation rate kobs were defined from dependences ln C0/Ct–t (Figure 1) using the least-squares method. Selection of pairs of values of argument and function was 10–12.Each experiment was repeated 2–3 times. Constants for the reaction of (Cl)2SnTPP in 100% H2SO4 and (Cl)2GeTPP in 99.93–100% 0 1 2 3 20 40 60 80 100 t/min ln C0 /Ct (1) (2) (3) (4) Figure 1 Dependence of the logarithm of the ratio of initial and current concentrations of metalloporphyrin ln C0 /Ct vs. time t. CH2SO4 (%): (1), (3) 99.96; (2), (4) 99.94.T/K: (1), (2) 362; (3), (4) 358. Figure 2 Dependence of the observed rate constant for dissociation of (Cl)2SnTPP vs. H2SO4 concentration. T/K: (1) 353, (2) 358, (3) 362, (4) 298. 20 10 18.650 18.655 18.660 (1) (2) (3) (4) [H2SO4]0/mol dm–3 kobs /10–4 s–1 kobs /10–6 s–1 10 (Cl)2MTPP + 4H+ Solv H4TPP2+ + (Cl)2M2+ Solv (1)Mendeleev Communications Electronic Version, Issue 6, 1997 (pp. 213–252) H2SO4 were published earlier,5,14 and values of kobs for dissociation of the tin complex in H2SO4–H2O mixtures were obtained for the first time (Figures 2, 3). It follows from Figure 1 that the rate equation for reaction (1) for the complexes of tin(IV) and germanium(IV) can be expressed by equation (2): However, the influence of the H2SO4 concentration complicates the rate equation.As shown in Figure 2, the plot of the observed rate constant for the dissociation of (Cl)2SnTPP vs. [H2SO4] yields a curve concave to the axis of the rate constant and passing through the origin (the complex does not undergo dissociation in aqueous solutions). A general rate law conforming to this situation is given by equations (3) or (4): The values of k1 and k2 obtained from the linear dependence of kobs/[H2SO4] vs.[H2SO4] [correlation coefficient r = 0.97; selection of pairs of values of argument and function (2–3)×5] within the least-squares method are (5±1)×10–3 dm6 mol–2 s–1 and (1.0±0.2)×10–2 dm3 mol–1 s–1, respectively, at 353–362 K. The temperature dependence of the rate constants is within the limits of stated error.An attempt to find the linear correlation of kobs and [H3O+], [H3O+]2, [H2SO4] or [H2SO4]2 leads to worse correlation coefficients. The general rate equation (5) testifies that the dissociation reaction of the tin complex proceeds along two parallel routes. This fact has been found experimentally for the first time for the dissociation reactions of metalloporphyrins and their azabenzo analogues – the metallophthalocyanines.Each of the mentioned routes of the reaction can be interpreted within the bounds of mechanisms already known for other metalloporphyrins: SEN39 (route 1 with k1 constant) and SN215 (route 2 with k2 constant). The corresponding transition states are: [(Cl)2MTPP·2H2SO4]� and [(Cl)2MTPP·H2SO4]�. It must be pointed out that the dissociation reaction for the tin complex proceeds along route 1 under the action of H2SO4 molecules but not H3O+ as for metallophthalocyanines.In case of (Cl)2GeTPP kobs constants (Figure 3) are in linear correlation with [H2SO4]2 (r = 0.97): where k1 = (1.4±0.2)×10–3 and (5.5±1)×10–3 dm6 mol–2 s–1 at 323 and 333 K, respectively, Ea = 121 kJ mol–1, DS� = = 69 J mol–1 K–1.Comparison of equations (5) and (6) shows that the reaction route with k2 constant is imperceptible for the dissociation of the germanium complex. The stability of the metalloporphyrins discussed in the mixed solvent H2Ssh;H2O in the Brand region (where H3O+ concentration is high) as well as specific rate equation (5), are apparently caused by the strong covalent bonding of acido ligands (Cl) in the coordination sphere.Dissociation of M–Cl bonds of complexes (Cl)2MTPP probably takes place only in media of maximum dielectric permeability, i.e. 99.94–100% H2SO4. References 1 A. B. P. Lever, Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem., 1965, 7, 27. 2 H. Zimmerman, Metalloporphirine, Molibdaenthiokomplexe und deren dohhelschtassoziate auf Silicagel. Diss. Dokt. Naturwiss., ETH, Zurich, 1984, 23 (in German). 3 B. D. Berezin, A. N. Drobisheva and E. A. Venedictov, Koord. Khim., 1976, 2, 346 [Sov. J. Coord. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), 1976, 257]. 4 A. Adeyemo, A. Valiotti, C. Burnham and P. Hambright, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1981, 54, 63. 5 T. N. Lomova and B. D. Berezin, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1979, 24, 1574 [J. Inorg. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 1979, 24, 874]. 6 T.N. Lomova, N. I. Volkova and B. D. Berezin, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1987, 32, 969 [J. Inorg. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 1987, 32, 542]. 7 R. Bonnett, P. Brewer, K. Noro and T. Noro, Tetrahedron, 1978, 34, 379. 8 Yu. V. Ishkov and Z. I. Zhilina, Zh. Org. Khim., 1995, 31, 136 (Russ. J. Org. Chem., 1995, 31, 123). 9 T. N. Lomova, E. G. Mozhzhukhina, L. P. Shormanova and B. D. Berezin, Zh.Obshch. Khim., 1989, 59, 2317 [J. Gen. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 1989, 59, 2077]. 10 J. I. Maskasky and M. E. Kenney, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, 95, 1443. 11 A. D. Adler, F. R. Longo, F. Kampas and J. Kim, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1970, 32, 2443. 12 A. L. Balch, C. R. Cornmann and M. M. Olmstead, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 2963. 13 P. Rothemund and A. Menotti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1948, 70, 1808. 14 T. N. Lomova, E. G. Mozhzhukhina and B. D. Berezin, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1993, 38, 1552 (in Russian). 15 T. N. Lomova and B. D. Berezin, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 1983, 42, 993 [J. Phys. Chem. USSR (Engl. Transl.), 1983, 42, 563]. –dC(Cl)2MTPP/dt = kobs[(Cl)2MTPP] (2) kobs = k1[H2SO4]2 + k2[H2SO4] kobs/[H2SO4] = k1[H2SO4] + k2 (3) (4) –dC(Cl)2SnTPP/dt = [(Cl)2SnTPP](k1[H2SO4]2 + k2[H2SO4]) (5) –dC(Cl)2GeTPP/dt = k1[(Cl)2GeTPP][H2SO4]2 (6) Figure 3 Dependence of the observed rate constant for dissociation of (Cl)2GeTPP vs. H2SO4 concentration. T/K: (1) 313, (2) 323, (3) 333, (4) 298. 20 10 18.650 18.655 18.660 (1) (2) (3) (4) [H2SO4]0/mol dm–3 kobs /10–4 s–1 kobs /10–5 s–1 10 20 18.650 18.655 18.660 Received: Moscow, 26th May 1997 Cambridge, 26th August 1997; Com. 7/03876C