首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >Acr appropriateness criteria? non-spine bone metastases
【24h】

Acr appropriateness criteria? non-spine bone metastases

机译:Acr appropriateness criteria? non-spine bone metastases

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bone is one of the most common sites of metastatic spread of malignancy, with possible deleterious effects including pain, hypercalcemia, and pathologic fracture. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) remains the mainstay for treatment of painful bone metastases. EBRT may be combined with other local therapies like surgery or with systemic treatments like chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, osteoclast inhibitors, or radiopharmaceuticals. EBRT is not commonly recommended for patients with asymptomatic bone metastases unless they are associated with a risk of pathologic fracture. For those who do receive EBRT, appropriate fractionation schemes include 30 Gy in 10 fractions, 24 Gy in 6 fractions, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, or a single 8 Gy fraction. Single fraction treatment maximizes convenience, while fractionated treatment courses are associated with a lower incidence of retreatment. The appropriate postoperative dose fractionation following surgical stabilization is uncertain. Reirradiation with EBRT may be safe and provide pain relief, though retreatment might create side effect risks which warrant its use as part of a clinical trial. All patients with bone metastases should be considered for concurrent management by a palliative care team, with patients whose life expectancy is less than six months appropriate for hospice evaluation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of palliative medicine》 |2012年第5期|521-526|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Henry Ford Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, United States;

    Sarasota Radiation Therapy Center, Sarasota, FL, United States;

    University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United StatesUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United StatesUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WI, United StatesWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United StatesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Society of Nuclear Medicine, Scarsdale, NY, United StatesUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, American Society of Clinical Oncology, AnnJohns Hopkins Outpatient Center, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Baltimore, MD, UnitedUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, UnitedBlanchard Valley Regional Cancer Center, Findlay, OH, United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类 临床医学;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号