...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Ecology >Grazing effects of wintering geese on grassland yield: A long‐term study from Northwest Germany
【24h】

Grazing effects of wintering geese on grassland yield: A long‐term study from Northwest Germany

机译:越冬鹅放牧对草地产量的影响——一项来自德国西北部的长期研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Escalating conflicts between grassland farming and wintering geese in northern Germany stimulated a long‐term study in order to promote a fair and workable system of compensation of harvest loss. Between 1996 and 2018 standardized experiments were carried out to quantify changes in yield loss and herbage quality. Simultaneously, we weekly monitored the number of geese to relate yield losses to goose numbers and to identify the impact of the different species. Exclosure experiments were established on conventionally managed grasslands. The number of investigated fields differed over the study period (1990s: n = 6, 2000s: n = 14, 2010s: n = 2–18). On each field, we established 12 marked plots (4.5 m2), six with exclosures from early November until the first cut of grass in May and six with access for the geese. In all plots dry biomass and the quality of herbage (contents of energy, crude protein, crude fibre and ash) were determined at first and second harvest. The total goose‐dependent yield losses at first harvest increased from 15 in the year 1996/97 to 50 at the end of the 2010s. The increase corresponds with changes in the maximum numbers and the migratory behaviour of the barnacle goose Branta leucopsis. Yield reductions correlated positively with densities of barnacle geese present in April. In contrast, we found no decline in grassland yields with increasing numbers of greater white‐fronted geese Anser albifrons. In all periods second harvest was not affected. The combined maximum number of both geese which were counted over approximately 23,000 ha of grasslands increased until 2002/03 but levelled off with numbers around 100,000 birds thereafter. While the maximum wintering population of greater white‐fronted geese dropped since 2007/08, the maximum number of barnacle geese increased until mid of 2010s. An increasing proportion of barnacle geese delayed their departure until May. Within each year grazed plots possessed higher energy and crude protein contents than ungrazed controls, suggesting that the geese maximize their potential nutrient intake rate by grazing. Synthesis and applications. The present study reveals a significant increase in goose‐related loss of grassland yields which form the basis for a fair and comprehensible system of compensation payments to affected farmers.
机译:摘要 德国北部草原耕作与越冬鹅之间不断升级的冲突激发了一项长期研究,以促进公平可行的收获损失补偿制度。1996 年至 2018 年间进行了标准化实验,以量化产量损失和牧草质量的变化。同时,我们每周监测鹅的数量,将产量损失与鹅的数量联系起来,并确定不同物种的影响。在常规管理的草地上建立了封闭实验。在研究期间,调查的领域数量有所不同(1990年代:n = 6,2000年代:n = 14,2010年代:n = 2–18)。在每块田地上,我们建立了 12 个标记地块(4.5 m2),其中 6 个从 11 月初到 5 月第一次割草,6 个供鹅进入。在所有地块中,在第一次和第二次收获时测定了干生物量和牧草质量(能量、粗蛋白、粗纤维和灰分的含量)。第一次收获时依赖鹅的总产量损失从1996/97年度的15%增加到2010年代末的50%。这一增加与藤壶鹅布兰塔白斑的最大数量和迁徙行为的变化相对应。产量下降与4月份藤壶鹅的密度呈正相关。相比之下,我们发现草地产量没有随着白额雁 Anser albifrons 数量的增加而下降。在所有时期,第二次收获都没有受到影响。在大约23,000公顷的草原上,两只鹅的最大数量在2002/03年度之前有所增加,但此后趋于平稳,数量约为100,000只。自2007/08年度以来,大白额雁的最大越冬数量有所下降,但藤壶雁的最大数量在2010年代中期之前有所增加。越来越多的藤壶鹅推迟到5月离开。在每年内,放牧地块的能量和粗蛋白含量高于未放牧的对照组,这表明鹅通过放牧最大限度地提高了其潜在的营养摄入率。合成与应用.本研究显示,与鹅有关的草地产量损失显著增加,这为向受影响的农民提供公平和可理解的赔偿金制度奠定了基础。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号