首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >LSTM-CM: a hybrid approach for natural drought prediction based on deep learning and climate models
【24h】

LSTM-CM: a hybrid approach for natural drought prediction based on deep learning and climate models

机译:LSTM-CM:基于深度学习和气候模型的自然干旱预测混合方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Droughts cause severe damage to the economy, society, and environment. Drought forecasting plays an important role in establishing mitigation drought damage plans. In this study, a hybrid model involving long short-term memory and a climate model (LSTM-CM) is constructed for drought prediction. LSTM-CM was compared to the long short-term model stand-alone (LSTM-SA) and climate prediction model GloSea5 (GS5). The performance of models was evaluated based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (CC), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and skill score (SS). GS5 displayed physical robustness in predictions and did not reduce the amplitude or shift results. However, GS5 prediction tends to have a large bias caused by the inputs, model structure, and parameters. The MAEs of GS5 at 1, 2 and 3 months (0.41, 0.68, and 0.89) were higher than those of LSTM-SA (0.38, 0.61, and 0.89). The LSTM-SA reduced bias, but predictions were characterized by shifts, small variance, and failure to capture drought occurrences in long-lead-time cases. LSTM-CM yielded enhanced drought predictions by encompassing the low bias of LSTM-SA and the physical process simulation ability of GS5; thus, it inherited the good features of these models and limited the poor features. The SS values based on the CC, MAE, and RMSE of LSTM-CM compared to those of GS5 for 1 -, 2-, and 3-month lead time predictions were improved from 29.17 to 54.29, 22.47 to 34.15, and 1.75 to 35.09, respectively. LSTM-CM can accurately detect drought events and displayed less uncertainty in prediction than LSTM-SA and GS5.
机译:干旱对经济、社会和环境造成严重破坏。干旱预报在制定缓解干旱损害计划方面发挥着重要作用。本研究构建了长短期记忆和气候模式(LSTM-CM)的干旱预测混合模型。将LSTM-CM与长期短期独立模式(LSTM-SA)和气候预测模式GloSea5(GS5)进行了比较。基于Pearson相关系数(CC)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和技能得分(SS)对模型性能进行评价。GS5在预测中表现出物理鲁棒性,并且没有降低振幅或偏移结果。然而,GS5 预测往往存在由输入、模型结构和参数引起的较大偏差。GS5在1、2和3个月时的MAEs分别为0.41、0.68和0.89,高于LSTM-SA(0.38、0.61和0.89)。LSTM-SA降低了偏差,但预测的特点是偏移、方差小,以及在长提前期的情况下未能捕捉到干旱的发生。LSTM-CM利用LSTM-SA的低偏差和GS5的物理过程模拟能力,增强了干旱预测;因此,它继承了这些模型的优点,并限制了缺点。与GS5相比,LSTM-CM在1个月、2个月和3个月提前期预测中的SS值分别从29.17%提高到54.29%、22.47%提高到34.15%和1.75%提高到35.09%。与LSTM-SA和GS5相比,LSTM-CM能够准确检测干旱事件,并且在预测中表现出更少的不确定性。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-Dong, Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul 143-747, South Korea, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-Dong, Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul 143-747, South Korea;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-Dong, Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul 143-747, South Korea, Faculty of Water Resources Engineering, Thuyloi University, 175 Tay Son Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi 116705, Vietnam;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Natural drought index; Long short-term memory; GloSea5; Hybrid models;

    机译:自然干旱指数;长短期记忆;GloSea5;混合车型;
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号