首页> 外文期刊>International wound journal. >Potential cost-effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom
【24h】

Potential cost-effectiveness of using adjunctive dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft in the management of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers in the United Kingdom

机译:在英国使用辅助脱水人羊膜/绒毛膜同种异体移植物治疗不愈合糖尿病足溃疡的潜在成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) allografts (Epifix) as an adjunct to standard care, compared with standard care alone, to manage non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in secondary care in the United Kingdom, from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS). A Markov model was constructed to simulate the management of diabetic lower extremity ulcers over a period of 1 year. The model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of using adjunctive dHACM, compared with standard care alone, to treat non-healing DFUs in the United Kingdom, in terms of the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at 2019/2020 prices. The study estimated that at 12 months after the start of treatment, use of adjunctive dHACM instead of standard care alone is expected to lead to a 90 increase in the probability of healing, a 34 reduction in the probability of wound infection, a 57 reduction in the probability of wound recurrence, a 6 increase in the probability of avoiding an amputation, and 8 improvement in the number of QALYs. Additionally, if 4062 pound is spent on dHACM allografts per ulcer, then adjunctive use of dHACM instead of standard care alone is expected to lead to an incremental cost per QALY gain of 20 pound 000. However, if the amount spent on dHACM allografts was <=3250 pound per ulcer, the 12-month cost of managing an ulcer treated with adjunctive dHACM would break-even with that of DFUs treated with standard care, and it would have a 0.95 probability of being cost-effective at the 20 pound 000 per QALY threshold. In conclusion, within the study's limitations, and within a certain price range, adjunctive dHACM allografts afford the NHS a cost-effective intervention for the treatment of non-healing DFUs within secondary care among adult patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom.
机译:本研究的目的是从国家卫生服务体系 (NHS) 的角度,评估使用脱水人羊膜/绒毛膜 (dHACM) 同种异体移植物 (Epifix) 作为标准护理的辅助手段,与单独的标准护理相比,在英国二级护理中管理未愈合的糖尿病足溃疡 (DFU) 的成本效益。构建马尔可夫模型模拟糖尿病下肢溃疡1年内的发展情况。该模型用于估计在英国,与单独的标准护理相比,使用辅助 dHACM 治疗未愈合 DFU 的成本效益,根据 2019/2020 年价格获得的每质量调整生命年 (QALY) 增量成本。该研究估计,在治疗开始后 12 个月,使用辅助 dHACM 代替单独标准护理预计将导致愈合概率增加 90%,伤口感染概率降低 34%,伤口复发概率降低 57%,避免截肢的可能性增加 6%, QALY数量增加8%。此外,如果每个溃疡在 dHACM 同种异体移植物上花费 4062 磅,那么辅助使用 dHACM 而不是单独的标准护理预计将导致每 QALY 增加 20 磅 000 的成本。然而,如果在dHACM同种异体移植物上花费的金额为<=3250磅/溃疡,则使用辅助dHACM治疗溃疡的12个月成本将与标准护理治疗的DFUs收支平衡,并且在每QALY阈值20磅000时具有0.95成本效益的概率。总之,在研究的局限性和一定的价格范围内,辅助 dHACM 同种异体移植物为 NHS 提供了一种具有成本效益的干预措施,用于治疗英国 1 型或 2 型糖尿病成年患者的二级护理中未愈合的 DFU。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号