...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology >Comparison of Single versus Double Lateral Plating in Treatment of Feline Ilial Fractures Using Veterinary Cuttable Plates
【24h】

Comparison of Single versus Double Lateral Plating in Treatment of Feline Ilial Fractures Using Veterinary Cuttable Plates

机译:使用兽医可切割板治疗猫髂骨骨折的单侧板与双侧板的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective?The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of implant failure and the extent of pelvic canal narrowing associated with the fixation of ilial fractures in cats with a single veterinary cuttable plate (SLP) or double veterinary cuttable plates (DLP) applied to the lateral surface of the ilium. Study Design?Radiographic evaluation of feline ilial fractures plated laterally using SLP or DLP. Pelvic canal narrowing directly postoperatively and at 6 weeks follow-up was objectively measured using the sacral index (SI). Radiographs were evaluated for implant failure and fracture healing. Results?Seventy-seven cats satisfied the inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine fractures were treated with a SLP and 48 with DLP. Implant failure occurred significantly more (p?=?0.001) in the SLP group (14/29) compared with the DLP group (6/48). Follow-up SI was significantly different between the two groups (p?=?0.048, SLP median: 1.0 range: 0.83–2.4, DLP median: 0.98; range: 0.76–1.45). Median change in SI was ?0.04 (range: ?1.4 to 0.05) in the SLP group and 0.0 (range: ?0.23 to 0.23) in the DLP group. This difference was significantly different (p?=?0.031). Conclusion?DLP leads to significantly less implant failure and significantly less pelvic canal narrowing compared with SLP. This difference in pelvic canal narrowing was small and the clinical relevance remains unclear.
机译:目的?本研究的目的是比较植入物失败的频率和与固定猫髂骨骨折相关的盆腔狭窄程度,将单兽用可切割板 (SLP) 或双兽用可切割板 (DLP) 应用于髂骨的外侧表面。研究设计?使用 SLP 或 DLP 横向镀层的猫髂骨骨折的放射学评估。使用骶骨指数 (SI) 客观测量术后直接和 6 周随访时盆腔狭窄的情况。评估了种植体失败和骨折愈合的 X 光片。结果?77只猫符合纳入标准。29 例骨折采用 SLP 治疗,48 例骨折采用 DLP 治疗。SLP组(14/29)的种植体失败发生率(p?=?0.001)明显高于DLP组(6/48)。两组随访SI差异有统计学意义(p?=?0.048,SLP中位数:1.0,范围:0.83-2.4,DLP中位数:0.98;范围:0.76-1.45)。SLP 组的 SI 中位数变化为 -0.04(范围:-1.4 至 0.05),DLP 组为 0.0(范围:-0.23 至 0.23)。这种差异有统计学意义(p?=?0.031)。结论?与 SLP 相比,DLP 可显著减少种植体失败和盆腔管狭窄。盆腔管狭窄的这种差异很小,临床相关性尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号