...
首页> 外文期刊>Kidney international. >The risk of hospitalization and modality failure with home dialysis
【24h】

The risk of hospitalization and modality failure with home dialysis

机译:居家透析的住院风险和方式失败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While home dialysis is being promoted, there are few comparative effectiveness studies of home-based modalities to guide patient decisions. To address this, we matched 1116 daily home hemodialysis (DHD) patients by propensity scores to 2784 contemporaneous USRDS patients receiving home peritoneal dialysis (PD), and compared hospitalization rates from cardiovascular, infectious, access-related or bleeding causes (prespecified composite), and modality failure risk. We performed similar analyses for 1187 DHD patients matched to 3173 USRDS patients receiving in-center conventional hemodialysis (CHD). The composite hospitalization rate was significantly lower with DHD than with PD (0.93 vs. 1.35/patient-year, hazard ratio = 0.73 (95% CI = 0.67-0.79)). DHD patients spent significantly fewer days in hospital than PD patients (5.2 vs. 9.2 days/patient-year), and significantly more DHD patients remained admission-free (52% DHD vs. 32% PD). In contrast, there was no significant difference in hospitalizations between DHD and CHD
机译:虽然家庭透析正在得到推广,但很少有关于家庭透析方式的比较有效性研究来指导患者决策。为了解决这个问题,我们根据倾向评分将 1116 名每日家庭血液透析 (DHD) 患者与 2784 名同时接受家庭腹膜透析 (PD) 的 USRDS 患者进行了匹配,并比较了心血管、感染、通路相关或出血原因(预先指定的复合)和方式失败风险的住院率。我们对 1187 名 DHD 患者进行了类似的分析,这些患者与 3173 名接受中心常规血液透析 (CHD) 的 USRDS 患者相匹配。DHD组的综合住院率显著低于PD组(0.93 vs. 1.35/患者年,风险比= 0.73(95%CI=0.67-0.79))。DHD 患者住院天数明显少于 PD 患者(5.2 天 vs. 9.2 天/患者年),并且 DHD 患者未入院的天数明显更多(52% DHD vs 32% PD)。相比之下,DHD和冠心病的住院率没有显著差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号