...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >The Simulated Source Apportionment of Light Absorbing Aerosols: Effects of Microphysical Properties of Partially‐Coated Black Carbon
【24h】

The Simulated Source Apportionment of Light Absorbing Aerosols: Effects of Microphysical Properties of Partially‐Coated Black Carbon

机译:The Simulated Source Apportionment of Light Absorbing Aerosols: Effects of Microphysical Properties of Partially‐Coated Black Carbon

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Biomass burning (BB) fractions estimated with the aethalometer model differ from 0 even for pure aerosols from fossil fuel (FF) combustion. We used black carbon (BC) aerosols partially‐coated with non‐absorbing materials to represent typical FF aerosols, and the BB fractions were determined with the aethalometer model. Thus, the estimated BB fractions are the fractions that FF aerosols are incorrectly attributed to BB aerosols. The BC morphology and mixing state have significant effects on the estimation of BB fractions. For freshly emitted BC, the BB fractions do not deviate significantly from 0, and the BB fraction is generally in the range of −1%–10% based on an FF absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) of 1 and a BB AAE of 2. The BB fraction deviates substantially from 0 when BC becomes compact and is coated. The absolute values of the deviations sometimes can be close to 100% for heavily coated BC. The BB fraction is generally greater than 0 for fluffy BC while compact BC generally exhibits a negative BB fraction. The BB fractions of partially‐coated BC are very sensitive to the size distribution and coating ratio, which is consistent with the results of the core‐shell sphere model. We have also performed a series of studies with different configurations for BC morphologies, coating ratios, and mixing states, which show the variations of the estimated BB fractions with atmospheric aging. We also explain the reasons for the uncertainties in the BB fraction estimates and provide suggestions for using different AAE pairs.
机译:摘要生物质燃烧(BB)分数估计甚至与aethalometer模型不同于0纯粹的气溶胶的化石燃料(FF)燃烧。部分涂层与非吸收材料代表典型的FF气溶胶,BB分数与aethalometer测定模型。分数,FF气溶胶是错误的归因于BB气溶胶。混合状态有显著的影响BB估计分数。公元前,BB分数不显著偏离从0,BB分数一般−1% -10%基于FF的吸收埃指数(AAE)的1和2的BB AAE。BB分数大大偏离了0当公元前变得紧凑,是涂层。有时偏差的绝对值公元前是接近100%的重涂。分数通常是大于0的蓬松公元前公元前而紧凑的通常展品消极BB分数。公元前大小分布非常敏感和涂层比,这是一致的核心必经壳球体模型的结果。也进行了一系列的研究与不同配置BC形态、涂料显示的比率,和混合状态估计BB分数的变化大气老化。不确定性的BB分数估计和使用提供建议AAE对不同。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号