...
首页> 外文期刊>Vet Record >Impact of adopting non‐antibiotic dry‐cow therapy on the performance and udder health of dairy cows
【24h】

Impact of adopting non‐antibiotic dry‐cow therapy on the performance and udder health of dairy cows

机译:Impact of adopting non‐antibiotic dry‐cow therapy on the performance and udder health of dairy cows

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background On dairy farms, the prophylactic use of antibiotics at drying‐off is being increasingly challenged. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of antibiotic dry‐cow therapy (DCT) or non‐antibiotic DCT on dairy cow performance and udder health. Methods Holstein cows (n = 285) with low risk of intramammary infection ( 0.05) difference between treatments for mean cow milk yield, composition or energy corrected milk yield. Mean somatic cell count was 0.16 loge higher in the TS treatment (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.00 loge to −0.33 loge) compared to A + TS treatment (p = 0.047). A 50% increase in the number of mastitis cases was observed in the A + TS treatment compared to TS treatment (odds ratio = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.80%–3.01%), although this was not significant. There was no statistical evidence (p > 0.05) that treatment had any effect on colostrum quality and composition. Conclusion Results indicate that non‐antibiotic DCT can be adopted in ‘low‐risk’ cows who were offered grass silage‐based diets in cubicle accommodation, with low risk of adverse effects on performance or udder health.
机译:摘要背景在奶牛场预防性使用抗生素在干燥所致了越来越多的挑战。本研究旨在研究的影响抗生素(DCT)或干牛应承担的治疗非抗生素对奶牛性能DCT和乳房的健康。风险较低的乳房内的感染( 0.05),不同的意思牛奶产量、成分或能量修正牛奶产量。更高的TS治疗(95%的信心区间[CI]:−0.00包厢−0.33包厢)相比+ TS治疗(p = 0.047)。乳腺炎的数量情况下被观察到+ TS治疗相比,TS治疗(优势比= 1.5,95%置信区间CI: 0.80% - -3.01%),虽然这不是重要的。统计证据(p > 0.05),治疗对初乳质量有任何影响吗组成。非检测抗生素DCT可以采用“低风险”应承担的牛人提供草青贮饲料量为基础的饮食较低的房间住宿、不良的风险影响性能或乳房健康。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号