Integrating multiple data sources improves prediction and inference for upland game bird occupancy models

摘要

Lay Summary center dot Many types of surveys are used to track bird populations. Surveys can be designed to detect a broad range of species but may be inefficient at detecting species in rare habitats. Targeted surveys for these species, however, can be biased toward high-quality habitats, making it hard to extrapolate the results. center dot We combined data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) and eBird with a targeted survey to estimate habitat use of Northern Bobwhite and Ring-Necked Pheasant in Illinois. We documented the efficiency and overlap of these surveys. center dot We found that adding BBS to targeted surveys reduced uncertainty in estimates of habitat use. Targeted surveys alone failed to sample all available habitats in Illinois, while BBS data alone did not predict habitat use as well. center dot Combining data from multiple surveys can fill in gaps in the individual surveys and reduce uncertainty in estimates of habitat use. Bird populations have declined across North America over the past several decades. Bird monitoring programs are essential for monitoring populations, but often must strike a balance between efficiency of data collection and spatial biases. Species- or habitat-specialist-specific monitoring programs may be helpful for increasing efficiency of sampling and understanding effects of management actions, but may be subject to preferential sampling bias if they are used to assess large-scale occupancy or abundance and monitoring is largely focused in high-quality habitat. More general monitoring programs, such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) and eBird, may not preferentially sample specialists' habitats but are subject to other forms of bias and often do not efficiently sample specialists' habitats. We used an integrated occupancy model combining data from eBird, BBS, and Illinois state surveys of upland game bird habitat areas to estimate drivers of Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) and Ring-Necked Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) occupancy and compare inference from single-visit, multi-visit, and integrated monitoring programs. We fit sets of candidate models using every combination of the 3 datasets except for eBird by itself, to better understand how differences in spatial biases between programs affect ecological inference. We found that, for both bobwhite and pheasant, state surveys of upland habitat increased the predictive ability of models, and BBS data usually improved inference on occupancy parameters when it was integrated with other data sources. Integrating multiple data sources partially resolved the spatial gaps in each monitoring program, while also increasing precision of parameter estimates. Integrated models may be capable of combining the higher sampling efficiency of targeted monitoring programs with the more even spatial coverage of broad-scale monitoring programs.