首页> 外文期刊>European Security & Defence >The EU as an International Security Institution
【24h】

The EU as an International Security Institution

机译:欧盟作为国际安全机构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One might wonder why there cannot be a NATO taking care of security and threat management and an EU taking care of trade and trade management. Nevertheless, there is increasing competition between the great powers assuming the form of a global struggle for power and position. The US focus on innovation and technology means that the European NATO member countries and EU are subjected to renewed pressure. The EDF and NATO's Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic -or DIANA - are both working with the private sector and academia, to ensure that they can harness the best of new technology for Euro-Transatlantic security. The result is that taxpayers are paying twice for the same service. Whether this is an intelligent way of doing business, only the future will show. The discussion about the wisdom in having an EU as a security institution will continue and the result might well be that EU Member States that are also NATO Allies are hedging their bets in favour of the Alliance's better defined defence mandate, rather than that of the EU, whose ambitions for common security and defence remain largely statements of intent. This should be seen in the context of the current security situation in Europe, and Finland and Sweden's pending accession to NATO.
机译:人可能会想为什么不能有北约护理安全管理和欧盟的威胁照顾贸易和贸易管理。然而,有越来越多的竞争大国之间的假设的形式全球争取权利和地位。专注于创新和技术意味着欧洲的北约成员国和欧盟承受新的压力。国防创新加速器大西洋——戴安娜-都是使用私营部门和学术界,确保他们可以利用的新技术Euro-Transatlantic安全。纳税人支付两次相同的服务。是否这是一个聪明的方法业务,只有未来将显示。讨论在欧盟作为一个智慧安全机构将继续和结果很可能是欧盟成员国也北约盟国正在两面下注的联盟的定义更好的防御授权,而不是欧盟的野心共同安全与防务仍然很大程度上声明的意图。目前的安全局势欧洲,芬兰和瑞典的等待加入北约。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号