...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Arthroscopic-Assisted Double-Bundle Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tape Provides Superior Vertical Stability Than the Single-Bundle Reconstruction for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
【24h】

Arthroscopic-Assisted Double-Bundle Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tape Provides Superior Vertical Stability Than the Single-Bundle Reconstruction for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

机译:关节镜辅助双束喙锁韧带重建术使用皮质固定纽扣和缝合带,比单束重建术在急性肩锁关节脱位方面具有更好的垂直稳定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North AmericaPurpose: This study aimed to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between single- and double-bundle arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic-assisted CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes for acute AC joint dislocation from July 2014 to March 2019 were identified. This study included patients treated for acute AC joint dislocation within 2 weeks after an injury, with a Rockwood classification of III or V and at least 2 years of follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction technique: group I (single-bundle technique) and group II (double-bundle technique). The clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and visual analog scale for pain score between the 2 groups. On the plain radiograph, the CC interval ratio (CCIR) was measured to evaluate maintenance of CC interval fixation. Postoperative complications, including reduction failure, were also documented. Results: Fifty-eight patients (26 in group I, 32 in group II) were enrolled. There were no significant differences in CCIR between the 2 groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. However, the CCIR of group I was significantly greater than that of group II 6 months postoperatively (group I: 160.5% ± 48.5%, group II: 125.4% ± 38.9% at 6 months postoperatively, P = .01; group I: 164.0% ± 57.3%, group II: 123.2% ± 35.9% at the last visit, P = .01). Despite radiologic differences, the clinical outcomes demonstrated no significant differences between 2 the groups (ASES score: 93.5 ± 5.2 in group I, 94.4 ± 4.5 in group II, P = .54; Constant score: 92.9 ± 5.3 in group I, 94.8 ± 4.3 in group II, P = .16). Reduction failure occurred in 4 patients (15.3%) in group I and in 1 patient (3.2%) in group II (P = .16). Conclusions: Arthroscopic-assisted double-bundle CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes provided superior vertical stability than the single-bundle technique. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
机译:? AmericaPurpose:本研究旨在比较单之间的临床和影像学结果和double-bundle arthroscopic-assistedcoracoclavicular (CC)韧带重建用皮质固定按钮缝合磁带对急性肩锁的关节(AC)位错。arthroscopic-assisted CC韧带重建用皮质固定按钮缝合磁带从2014年7月到急性AC关节脱位2019年3月被确定。病人治疗急性AC关节脱位伤后2周内,罗克伍德分类III和V和至少2年随访。基于重建技术:我组(单包技术)和组II(double-bundle技术)。比较使用美国肩肘外科医生(ase)得分,得分,和视觉两组之间的疼痛模拟量表得分。在普通x光照片,CC间隔比例(CCIR)测量评估CC的维护间隔固定。包括减少失败,也记录。组我,32组II)登记。CCIR之间没有显著差异两组术前和3个月术后。明显比第二组6个月术后(集团我:160.5%±48.5%,第二组:125.4%±38.9%,6个月术后,P = . 01;57.3%,第二组:在最后123.2%±35.9%访问中,P = . 01)。临床结果证明不重要区别2组(ase分数:93.5±5.2在我组,94.4±4.5在第二组,P= 54;94.8±4.3在第二组,P = 16)。故障发生在在我组4例(15.3%)和1例患者(3.2%)在第二组(P = 16)。结论:Arthroscopic-assisted double-bundle使用皮质CC韧带重建与缝合固定按钮提供磁带比优越的垂直稳定单包技术。第三,回顾性对比研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号