...
【24h】

Improved Pain and Perioperative Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy With the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block

机译:髋关节镜检查囊周神经群阻滞后疼痛和围手术期结局改善

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North AmericaPurpose: To compare early postoperative pain in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with versus without the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block. Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data was performed to identify patients who underwent hip arthroscopy at a single institution between May 2019 and October 2021. Patients were included if they received general anesthesia and were opioid naive. Patients who received the PENG block were compared with patients who did not. Opioid, benzodiazepine, and antiemetic medication administration was recorded both intraoperatively and for the duration of the patient's stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Opioids administered were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale. Time to discharge (in minutes) and complications were recorded. Results: A total of 53 patients were identified for inclusion, of whom 28 received the PENG block and 25 did not. Opioid consumption was significantly lower in the PENG block group both intraoperatively (16.9 ± 14.1 MMEs vs 40.6 ± 18.3 MMEs, P < .001) and in the PACU (14.4 ± 11.4 MMEs vs 31.2 ± 20.1 MMEs, P < .001). The highest recorded PACU pain score was significantly greater in the no-PENG block group (7.0 ± 1.9 vs 5.3 ± 2.1, P = .004). Within the PENG block group, fewer patients required antiemetics (0 vs 4, P = .043). There was a greater time to discharge in the no-PENG block group (161 ± 50 minutes vs 129 ± 34 minutes, P = .008). No complications, including postoperative falls, were noted in either group. Conclusions: The PENG block improves perioperative outcomes by decreasing pain, opioid consumption, time to discharge, antiemetic requirements, and benzodiazepine requirements after hip arthroscopy. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.
机译:? 术后早期AmericaPurpose:比较接受臀部疼痛患者关节镜与没有pericapsular神经组织(彭)块。回顾前瞻性收集的数据执行确定病人髋关节关节镜在一个单一的机构之间的可能2019年和2021年10月。他们收到了全身麻醉,阿片类药物天真。相比之下,患者没有。苯二氮、止呕吐的药物政府处理记录期间,病人的呆在postanesthesia病房(PACU)。管理被转换为吗啡毫克等价物(这是因为)。视觉模拟尺度。分钟)和并发症被记录了下来。结果:共有53名患者包含,其中28收到彭块和25没有。彭块组显著降低处理(16.9±14.1是因为vs 40.6±18.3这是因为vs 31.2±20.1,P <措施)。记录PACU的疼痛评分显著大no-PENG块组(7.0±1.9 vs5.3±2.1,P = 04)。集团,更少的病人需要止吐药(0 vs4, P = .043)。放电no-PENG块组(161±50分钟vs 129±34分钟,P = .008)。并发症包括术后下降,被发现在两组。块,从而提高围手术期的结果减少痛苦,阿片类药物消费,时间放电,止吐剂需求,苯二氮需求后臀部关节镜检查。回顾性比较治疗试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号