首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology. >Reduction in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Burden in Patients Enrolled in the RAID Trial
【24h】

Reduction in Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Burden in Patients Enrolled in the RAID Trial

机译:减少参加 RAID 试验的患者室性快速性心律失常负担

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2022 The AuthorsBackground: The RAID (Ranolazine Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator) randomized placebo-controlled trial showed that ranolazine treatment was associated with reduction in recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) requiring appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Objectives: This study aimed to identify groups of patients in whom ranolazine treatment would result in the highest reduction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) burden. Methods: Andersen-Gill analyses were performed to identify variables associated with risk for VTA burden among 1,012 patients enrolled in RAID. The primary endpoint was VTA burden defined as VTA episodes requiring appropriate treatment. Results: Multivariate analysis identified 7 factors associated with increased VTA burden: history of VTA, age ≥65 years, New York Heart Association functional class ≥III, QRS complex (≥130 ms), low ejection fraction (<30%), atrial fibrillation (AF), and concomitant antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. The effect of ranolazine on VTA burden was seen among patients without concomitant AAD therapy (HR [HR]: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55-0.84; P < 0.001), whereas no effect was seen among those who are concomitantly treated with other AADs (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.90-1.96; P = 0.16); P = 0.003 for interaction. In patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) ICDs, ranolazine treatment was associated with a 36% risk reduction for VTA recurrence (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86; P < 0.001), whereas among patients with ICDs without CRT no significant effect was noted (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.74-1.18; P = 0.57); P = 0.047 for interaction. Conclusions: In patients with high risk for VTA, ranolazine is effective in reducing VTA burden, with significantly greater effect in CRT-treated patients, those without AF, and those not treated with concomitant AADs. In patients already on AADs or those with AF, the addition of ranolazine did not affect VTA burden. (Ranolazine Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Trial [RAID]; NCT01215253)
机译:? 植入式心律转复除颤器)随机安慰剂对照试验显示ranolazine治疗有关减少复发性室性心动过速(VT)需要适当的植入心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗。目的:本研究旨在确定组在人ranolazine治疗的患者导致减少心室最高快速性心律失常(VTA)负担。Andersen-Gill分析进行识别与风险有关的因素VTA负担在1012名患者参加突袭。主要终点是定义为VTA VTA负担集需要适当的治疗。结果:多变量分析发现7与增加VTA负担相关的因素:VTA的历史,年龄≥65岁,纽约的心脏协会功能类≥3,QRS波群(≥130 ms)、射血分数较低(< 30%),心房颤动,伴随抗心律失常的药物(AAD)治疗。VTA被患者没有负担伴随AAD疗法(HR(人力资源):0.68;0.55 - -0.84;那些与此同时处理其他广告(人力资源:1.33;0.16);心脏再同步治疗(CRT)ICDs ranolazine治疗有关VTA复发风险减少36%(人力资源:0.64;95%置信区间:0.47—-0.86;ICDs没有CRT患者意义重大效果是指出(人力资源:0.94;= 0.57);VTA高危患者,ranolazine有效地降低VTA负担,在CRT-treated大大增强效果患者、无房颤和那些没有治疗随之而来的广告。法或那些有房颤,ranolazine的加法并不影响VTA负担。植入式心律转复除颤器试验黑RAID铝;

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号