首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. >Stereotactic Radioablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in the Setting of Electrical Storm
【24h】

Stereotactic Radioablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in the Setting of Electrical Storm

机译:立体定向放射消融治疗电风暴背景下的室性心动过速

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been reported as a safe and efficient therapy for treating refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) despite optimal medical treatment and catheter ablation. However, data on the use of SBRT in patients with electrical storm (ES) is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes associated with SBRT in the context of ES. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent SBRT in the context of ES from March 2020 to March 2021 in one tertiary center (CHU Lille). The target volume was delineated according to a predefined workflow. The efficacy was assessed with the following end points: sustained VT recurrence, VT reduced with antitachycardia pacing, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. Results: Seventeen patients underwent SBRT to treat refractory VT in the context of ES (mean 67 +/- 12.8 age, 59% presenting ischemic heart disease, mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 33.7 +/- 9.7%). Five patients presented with ES related to incessant VT. Among these 5 patients, the time to effectiveness ranged from 1 to 7 weeks after SBRT. In the 12 remaining patients, VT recurrences occurred in 7 patients during the first 6 weeks following SBRT. After a median 12.5 (10.5-17.8) months follow-up, a significant reduction of the VT burden was observed beyond 6 weeks (-91% [95% CI, 78-103]), P<0.0001). The incidence of implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock and antitachycardia pacing was 36% at 1 year. Conclusions: SBRT is associated with a significant reduction of the VT burden in the event of an ES; however, prospective randomized control trials are needed. In patients without incessant VT, recurrences are observed in half of patients during the first 6 weeks. VT tolerance and implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming adjustments should be integrated as part of an action plan defined before SBRT for each patient.
机译:背景:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)被报告为一个安全的和有效的治疗呢治疗难治性室性心动过速(VT)尽管最佳医疗和导管消融。患者SBRT电风暴(ES)缺乏。与SBRT相关的临床结果ES。包括病人SBRT的背景下从2020年3月至2021年3月一个三级中心(CHU里尔)。根据预定义的成交量划定工作流。终点:持续的VT复发,VT减少与antitachycardia踱来踱去植入型心律转复除颤器冲击。结果:17例接受SBRT治疗难治性VT的ES(平均67+ / - 12.8岁,59%的缺血性心脏疾病,意味着左心室射血分数:33.7 + / - 9.7%)。与不断的VT。其中5例,时间效力范围从1到7周后SBRT。病人在VT复发发生在7第一个SBRT后6周。(10.5 - -17.8)个月的随访,意义重大减少观察VT负担超过6周(-91%(95%可信区间,78 - 103)),P < 0.0001)。植入式心律转变器的发生率除颤器震惊和antitachycardia踱来踱去36%在1年。与VT的显著减少在事件的ES负担;前瞻性随机对照试验是必要的。没有不断的VT,患者复发观察到一半的病人在第一次6周。去纤颤器编程应该调整定义集成作为一项行动计划的一部分为每个病人SBRT之前。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号