首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Methods >Assessing an Alternative for 'Negative Variance Components': A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling for Negative Associations Among Patients With Personalized Treatments
【24h】

Assessing an Alternative for 'Negative Variance Components': A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling for Negative Associations Among Patients With Personalized Treatments

机译:评估“负方差分量”的替代方案:贝叶斯协方差结构建模的温和介绍,用于个性化治疗患者之间的负关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The multilevel model (MLM) is the popular approach to describe dependences of hierarchically clustered observations. A main feature is the capability to estimate (cluster-specific) random effect parameters, while their distribution describes the variation across clusters. However, the MLM can only model positive associations among clustered observations, and it is not suitable for small sample sizes. The limitation of the MLM becomes apparent when estimation methods produce negative estimates for random effect variances, which can be seen as an indication that observations are negatively correlated. A gentle introduction to Bayesian covariance structure modeling (BCSM) is given, which makes it possible to model also negatively correlated observations. The BCSM does not model dependences through random (cluster-specific) effects, but through a covariance matrix. We show that this makes the BCSM particularly useful for small data samples. We draw specific attention to detect effects of a personalized intervention. The effect of a personalized treatment can differ across individuals, and this can lead to negative associations among measurements of individuals who are treated by the same therapist. It is shown that the BCSM enables the modeling of negative associations among clustered measurements and aids in the interpretation of negative clustering effects. Through a simulation study and by analysis of a real data example, we discuss the suitability of the BCSM for small data sets and for exploring effects of individualized treatments, specifically when (standard) MLM software produces negative or zero variance estimates. Translational Abstract Clustered data are so common in many fields, that it is well-known that multilevel models are helpful in the analysis of clustered data (e.g., students within classroom, employees within companies, and observations in individuals). In psychotherapy research, a multilevel analysis closely aligns with the clinical practice and arises naturally, when studying questions pertaining to individual change in a repeated measures design. As individuals differ in how they react to (similar) events, modeling the heterogeneity of their responses provides a key avenue for modeling individual effects. However, for personalized interventions, increased heterogeneity can be expected among individuals over time: Therapists will succeed better in personalization (the intervention) for some than for others, and individuals will respond differently to a personalized treatment. When the effectiveness of the personalized treatment given by the therapist differs across individuals, associations among measurements across individuals can even be negative. This apparent contradiction requires a different multilevel modeling parameterization to be able to model negative associations among clustered measurements, because the multilevel model will always describe positive associations. We present Bayesian covariance structure modeling (BCSM) for assessment of negative associations between measurements, a novel modeling technique that can deal with the issues of individual differences. BCSM provides a way to explore individual differences in treatment effects next to identifying a main treatment effect. With BCSM individual treatment effects can be identified, and it can be explored who will or will not benefit from the treatment.
机译:多层次模型(传销)是受欢迎的方法描述分层次的依赖性集群的观察。能力评估(提供集群范围内)随机的影响参数,而他们的分布跨集群描述变化。传销只能积极的关联模型集群中观察,事实并非如此适合小样本大小。传销的估计时变得明显对随机方法产生负面估计效果差异,可以视为一个迹象表明观测是消极的相关的。协方差结构建模(BCSM),这使得它可能模型还消极相关的观察。通过随机依赖性(提供集群范围内)影响,但通过协方差矩阵。这使得BCSM特别有用小样本数据。检测一个个性化的干预的影响。个性化的治疗可以不同的影响个人,这可能导致负面的测量个体之间的关联治疗的治疗师。表明BCSM使的建模消极的集群之间的关联测量和艾滋病的解释集群的负面效应。研究和分析的一个真实数据的例子,我们讨论BCSM对于小型的适用性数据集和探索的影响个性化的治疗,特别是当(标准)传销软件产生负面或零方差估计。集群数据在许多领域是如此普遍,众所周知,多级模型有助于集群数据的分析(例如,学生在课堂内,员工内部公司和个人观察)。心理治疗研究多层次分析密切与临床实践出现自然,当学习的问题属于个人的变化重复措施的设计。他们的反应(类似的)事件,建模异质性的响应提供了一个关键个人影响大道的建模。为个性化的干预,增加可以预期的个体异质性随着时间的推移:治疗师将更好的取得成功个性化(干预)比对另一些人来说,和个人的反应不同的个性化治疗。个性化治疗的有效性通过治疗师个人不同,协会在测量过个人甚至可以是负的。矛盾需要不同的多级建模参数化模型消极的集群之间的关联测量,因为多级模型总是描述积极的协会。贝叶斯建模(BCSM)协方差结构评估之间的负关联可以测量,一个新颖的建模技术个体差异的处理问题。BCSM探索个体提供了一种方法旁边的治疗效果的差异识别主要的治疗效果。个人治疗效果可以发现,和它可以探索会或者不会从治疗中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号