首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Medical Association Journal: Journal de l'Association Medicale Canadienne >A population-based analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on common abdominal and gynecological emergency department visits
【24h】

A population-based analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on common abdominal and gynecological emergency department visits

机译:以人群为基础的分析的影响常见的腹部和COVID-19大流行妇科急诊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Reduced use of the emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic may result in increased disease acuity when patients do seek health care services. We sought to evaluate emergency department visits for common abdominal and gynecologic conditions before and at the beginning of the pandemic to determine whether changes in emergency department attendance had serious consequences for patients. Methods: We conducted a population-based analysis using administrative data to evaluate the weekly rate of emergency department visits pre-COVID-19 (Jan. 1-Mar. 10, 2020) and during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mar. 11-June 30,2020), compared with a historical control period (Jan. 1-July 1,2019). All residents of Ontario, Canada, presenting to the emergency department with appendicitis, cholecystitis, ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage were included. We evaluated weekly incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of emergency department visits, management strategies and clinical outcomes. Results: Across all study periods, 39691 emergency department visits met inclusion criteria (40.2 % appendicitis, 32.1% miscarriage, 21.3% cholecystitis, 6.4% ectopic pregnancy). Baseline characteristics of patients presenting to the emergency department did not vary across study periods. After an initial reduction in emergency department visits, presentations for cholecystitis and ectopic pregnancy quickly returned to expected levels. However, presentations for appendicitis and miscarriage (see figure) showed sustained reductions (IRR 0.61-0.80), with 1087 and 984 fewer visits, respectively, after the start of the pandemic, relative to 2019. Management strategies, complications and mortality rates were similar across study periods for all conditions. Interpretation: Although our study showed evidence of emergency department avoidance in Ontario during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, no adverse consequences were evident. Emergency care and outcomes for patients were similar before and during the pandemic.
机译:背景:减少使用的紧急情况部门在COVID-19大流行可能导致疾病的灵敏度增加当病人做寻求卫生保健服务。评估急诊常见腹部和妇科疾病年初确定的大流行急诊科是否变化出勤率对病人有严重的后果。方法:我们进行了一项以人群为基础的分析每周使用行政数据来评估急诊pre-COVID-19(1月1日。COVID-19大流行(2020年6月11日3月30日),与历史相比控制时期(1月。2019年7月1日1日)。呈现的急诊室阑尾炎、胆囊炎、异位妊娠流产了。发病率比(irr)进入紧急状态部门访问、管理策略和临床结果。时期,39691年急诊了阑尾炎入选标准(40.2%,32.1%胆囊炎流产,21.3%,6.4%的异位怀孕)。急诊科的没有不同学习阶段。减少急诊,演示胆囊炎和异位怀孕快回到预期水平。然而,阑尾炎和演示流产(见图)显示持续减少(IRR 0.61 - -0.80), 1087年和984年分别少访问后开始的大流行,相对于2019。策略,并发症和死亡率类似的在研究期限条件。显示急诊科回避的证据在安大略省COVID-19的第一波大流行,没有明显的不良后果。急诊病人和结果类似的大流行之前和期间。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号