...
首页> 外文期刊>Human psychopharmacology: clinical and experimental >Bupropion versus methylphenidate in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Randomized double-blind study
【24h】

Bupropion versus methylphenidate in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Randomized double-blind study

机译:安非他酮和哌醋甲酯治疗与注意缺陷/多动的孩子障碍:随机双盲研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of bupropion with methylphenidate in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods In a 6-week randomized double-blind study, 44 patients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD were randomly assigned to receive bupropion 100-150 mg/day (100 mg/day for 30 kg and 150 mg/day for 30 kg) or methylphenidate 20-30 mg/day. Symptoms were assessed using Teacher and Parent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) at baseline and weeks 3 and 6. Results Forty patients had at least one post-baseline measurement, and 38 patients completed the trial. No significant difference was found between the two groups on the Parent and Teacher ADHD-RS-IV scores ([F(1, 38) = 0.266, p = 0.609] and [F(1, 38) = 0.001, p = 0.972], respectively). By week 6, 18 patients (90%) in each group achieved response on the Parent scale (Fisher's exact test p-value = 1.0). With the Teacher ADHD-RS-IV used, eight (40%) patients in the bupropion group and 12 (60%) patients in the methylphenidate group achieved response by week 6 (χ 2(1) = 1.600, p = 0.206). Headache was observed more frequently in the methylphenidate group. Frequency of other side effects was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions Bupropion has a comparable safety and efficacy profile with methylphenidate in children and adolescents with ADHD.
机译:摘要目的比较的安全性和有效性安非他酮在儿童和哌醋甲酯青少年与注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)。双盲研究中,患者44 DSM-IV-TR多动症的诊断被随机分配收到安非他酮100 - 150毫克/天(100毫克/天& 30公斤和150毫克/天的在30公斤)哌醋甲酯20 - 30毫克/天。评估使用的老师和家长注意缺陷多动症评级Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV)基线和周3和6. post-baseline测量和38例完成了试验。被发现在两组之间的父母吗和老师ADHD-RS-IV分数([F (38) = 0.266,p = 0.609]和[F (38) = 0.001, p = 0.972),分别)。每组父规模的反应来实现(确切概率法假定值= 1.0)。老师ADHD-RS-IV使用,8例(40%)患者安非他酮组和12个(60%)病人哌醋甲酯集团实现反应星期6(χ2 (1)= 1.600,p = 0.206)。观察哌醋甲酯更频繁组。两组之间的明显不同。结论安非他酮比较安全儿童的疗效剖面与哌醋甲酯和青少年患有ADHD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号