...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology. >Editors' Note: Blood Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury and Cognitive Impairment in Older Veterans
【24h】

Editors' Note: Blood Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury and Cognitive Impairment in Older Veterans

机译:编者注:创伤性脑的血液生物标志物受伤在老退伍军人和认知障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dr. Peltz et al. examined whether blood-based biomarkers can differentiate older veterans with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cognitive impairment in a crosssectional study of 155 veterans from 2 veterans’ retirement homes. They found that increased levels of blood-based, CNS-enriched exosomal biomarkers—particularly phosphorylated tau (p-tau), neurofilament light (NfL), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-α) -were associated with cognitive impairment and TBI. In response, Drs. Wisniewski and Fossati question the clinical utility of these biomarkers, suggesting that the differences in these biomarkers may be driven more by the presence of cognitive impairment rather than the history of TBI. They argue that there is no proven causal relationship between the remote TBI and the observed cognitive impairment in this group and point to the absence of differences in any of the biomarkers in the control group and the TBI group without cognitive impairment to support their position. They also note a previous article from the group in which amyloid beta 42 (Aβ42) was reported to be elevated for decades after TBI, not replicated in this article. Responding to these comments, the authors agree that their findings are most likely explained by cognitive impairment but argue that the biomarkers could differentiate non-TBI-related cognitive impairment from TBI-associated cognitive impairment. They acknowledge the differences in results between their 2 biomarker articles but note that different assays were used, analyzed in different laboratories, and that the samples were overlapping but different. Nevertheless, they hypothesize that biomarkers for TBI-associated cognitive impairment are likely to differ from classic biomarkers for Alzheimer disease. This exchange highlights the challenges of disentangling the cognitive effects of remote TBI from other causes of cognitive impairment and the potential variability in the results of biomarker studies depending on the assays and laboratories used.
机译:Peltz博士等人检查是否blood-based生物标志物可以区分老退伍军人和无创伤性脑损伤(TBI)在crosssectional认知障碍的研究155年退伍军人从2退伍军人养老院。他们发现blood-based水平上升,CNS-enriched exosomal biomarkers-particularly磷酸化τ(p-tau),神经丝的光(NfL)、白介素6 (il - 6)、肿瘤坏死因子a (TNF -α)则与认知有关损伤和创伤性脑损伤。和Fossati问题的临床效用这些生物标志物,这表明差异在这些生物标志物可能驱动存在认知障碍,而不是创伤性脑损伤的历史。证明因果关系远程创伤性脑损伤和观察到的认知障碍组和没有差异任何生物标志物的对照组创伤性脑损伤组无认知障碍支持他们的立场。β淀粉样蛋白42条集团42(β)据报道是升高了几十年创伤性脑损伤后,本文中没有复制。对这些评论,作者同意他们的发现是最有可能的解释认知障碍,但认为生物标志物可以区分non-TBI-related从TBI-associated认知障碍认知障碍。结果之间的差异2生物标志物文章,但请注意,不同的化验使用,在不同的实验室分析,样本重叠,但不同。不过,他们假设生物标志物TBI-associated认知障碍可能不同于经典的生物标志物阿尔茨海默病。把认知影响的挑战远程创伤性脑损伤的其他原因的认知障碍和潜在的变化根据生物标志物研究的结果分析和实验室使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号