...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology. >Reader Response: Blood Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury and Cognitive Impairment in Older Veterans
【24h】

Reader Response: Blood Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury and Cognitive Impairment in Older Veterans

机译:读者反应:血液生物标志物的创伤脑损伤在年龄和认知障碍退伍军人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article by Peltz et al.1 provides a nice example of differences in neurodegenerative biomarkers which can be found in patients with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) using blood samples enriched for CNS-derived exosomes. However, these differences seem driven more by the presence of cognitive impairment (CI) rather than the history of TBI itself. Based on the cohort studied (older veterans), there is no proven causality demonstrating that the CI in the TBI-CI group is actually driven by the remote TBI, which occurred decades previously. This could be an independent clinical finding in the veterans. Because the control group and the TBI-no-CI group did not differ in any of the biomarkers, it seems that the main driver of differences is cognitive impairment, which could be independent from the TBI even in the TBI-CI group. This article has some overlap with a recent study from this group, in which Aβ42 was reported to be elevated for decades after TBI.2 This is not the case in this article, with no clear explanation. One wonders the utility of these biomarkers in a clinical setting because they do not clarify the causes of the CI and are not specific to TBI.
机译:本文通过Peltz et al.1提供了一个不错神经退行性差异的例子生物标志物可以发现患者慢性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)使用血液样品纯度CNS-derived液囊。然而,这些差异似乎驱动认知障碍的存在(CI)创伤性脑损伤的历史本身。队列研究(老),没有证明因果关系证明的CITBI-CI组实际上是由远程创伤性脑损伤发生几十年以前。可能是一个独立的临床发现的退伍军人。TBI-no-CI集团没有任何差异生物标志物,似乎的主要推动力差异是认知障碍,这可能创伤性脑损伤甚至在TBI-CI是独立的组。最近的研究从这一组,其中一个β42据报道,几十年来TBI.2后升高在这篇文章中,情况并非如此清晰的解释。因为这些生物标志物在临床设置他们不澄清CI的原因,不是特定于创伤性脑损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号