...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Non adiabatic electron behavior through a supercritical perpendicular collisionless shock: Impact of the shock front turbulence
【24h】

Non adiabatic electron behavior through a supercritical perpendicular collisionless shock: Impact of the shock front turbulence

机译:通过一个非绝热电子的行为超临界垂直无碰撞的冲击:激震前沿湍流的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adiabatic and nonadiabatic electrons transmitted through a supercritical perpendicular shock wave are analyzed with the help of test particle simulations based on field components issued from 2 – D full-particle simulation. A previous analysis (Savoini et al., 2005) based on 1 – D shock profile, including mainly a ramp (no apparent foot) and defined at a fixed time, has identified three distinct electron populations: adiabatic, overadiabatic, and underadiabatic, respectively, identified by μ_(ds)/μ_(us)1, >1 and <1, where μ_(us) and μ_(ds) are the magnetic momenta in the upstream and downstream regions. Presently, this study is extended by investigating the impact of the time evolution of 2 – D shock front dynamics on these three populations. Analysis of individual time particle trajectories is performed and completed by statistics based on the use of different upstream velocity distributions (spherical shell of radius v_(shell) and a Maxwellian with thermal velocity v_(the)). In all statistics, the three electron populations are clearly recovered. Two types of shock front nonstationarity are analyzed. First, the impact of the nonstationarity along the shock normal (due to the front self-reformation only) strongly depends on the values of v_(shell) or v_(the). For low values, the percentages of adiabatic and overadiabatic electrons are almost comparable but become anticorrelated under the filtering impact of the self-reformation; the percentage of the underadiabatic population remains almost unchanged. In contrast, for large values, this impact becomes negligible and the adiabatic population alone becomes dominant. Second, when 2 – D nonstationarity effects along the shock front (moving rippling) are fully included, all three populations are strongly diffused, leading to a larger heating; the overadiabatic population becomes largely dominant (and even larger than the adiabatic one) and mainly contributes to the energy spectrum.
机译:绝热和非绝热的电子传播通过超临界垂直激波分析的帮助下测试粒子基于字段组件发出的模拟2 - D full-particle模拟。分析(Savoini et al ., 2005)基于1 - D冲击,主要包括斜坡(没有明显的脚)和定义,在一个固定的时间确定了三个不同的电子数量:分别由μ_ (ds) /μ_(美国)1 > 1和< 1,μ_(美国)和μ_ (ds)磁动量在上游和下游地区。目前,这项研究是延长调查的时间演化的影响在这三个2 - D激震前沿动态人群。轨迹执行和完成统计数据的基础上,使用不同的上游速度分布(球壳的半径v_(壳)和麦克斯韦速度与热v_())。人口明显恢复。激震前沿非平稳进行了分析。非平稳的影响的冲击正常(由于前面self-reformation只有)强烈的值取决于v_ (shell)或v_()。绝热和overadiabatic电子几乎类似但成为anticorrelated下过滤self-reformation的影响;underadiabatic人口的百分比仍然几乎不变。值,变得微不足道,这影响绝热人口仅成为主导。第二,当2 - D非平稳的效果激震前沿(移动)荡漾包括所有三个人口强劲扩散,导致一个更大的加热;overadiabatic人口变得很大程度上占主导地位(甚至比绝热)主要对能谱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号