...
【24h】

Sounding off

机译:听起来了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 'Take Your Pick', published in CI January 2007 (pp46-49), a comparison was made between liner services routed to the US East Coast (USEC) via the Panama and Suez canals. Many interesting issues were highlighted, several of which I have to take exception to, and which lack clarity. First, the cost front. The comparisons illustrated were largely based on a recent research report published by the UK maritime analysts Drewry Shipping Consultants. In table 2 of the article, the author took differences in distance, time and the number of ships needed to provide service all the way to ports in North East Asia. This is a most unlikely scenario for a Suez Canal service.
机译:在“随你挑吧”,2007年1月发表在CI(pp46-49),进行了比较衬服务路由到美国东海岸(购买)通过巴拿马和苏伊士运河。问题突出,其中一些采取例外,缺乏透明度。首先,成本方面。说明主要是基于最近的一次英国海事发表的研究报告分析师德鲁里航运咨询公司。本文的作者的差异距离,时间和船舶所需的数量提供服务到港口在北东亚。苏伊士运河的服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号