...
首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology. >Development of Nonpulmonary Vein Foci Increases Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After?Pulmonary Vein Isolation
【24h】

Development of Nonpulmonary Vein Foci Increases Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After?Pulmonary Vein Isolation

机译:发展Nonpulmonary静脉疫源地增加心房颤动复发的风险后吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objectives The aim of this paper was to clarify the impact of nonpulmonary vein foci (NPVF) on atrial fibrillation (AF)?recurrence after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Background NPVF are considered contributing factors for the recurrence of AF after PV isolation, but their exact role remains unclear. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 216 patients (paroxysmal AF, n?= 172; persistent AF, n?= 44) who underwent a second electrophysiological study 6 months after the original PV isolation. Patients with AF recurrence underwent additional ablation procedures for reconnected PV and NPVF. NPVF were detected in the control group and with drug infusion (isoproterenol or isoproterenol with adenosine triphosphate) during the first and second procedure. NPVF detected for the first time in the second session were defined as newly developed, and their effect on AF recurrence after the second procedure was investigated, along with the predictive factors for NPVF development. Results Patients with AF recurrence after the first session had a significantly higher reconnected PV (91.5% vs. 68.2%?in patients without recurrence). NPVF were detected in 20 and 54 patients in the first and second sessions, respectively. Patients with newly developed NPVF had a significantly higher AF recurrence (24.1% vs. 7.4% in patients?without newly developed NPVF). Newly developed NPVF and AF recurrence after the first session were independent predictors for AF recurrence after the second procedure, whereas AF history and NPVF in the first session?were independent predictors for newly developed NPVF. Conclusions NPVF detection and ablation may represent important therapeutic options to prevent AF recurrence,?especially in patients who require repeated procedures. Graphical abstract Display Omitted
机译:本文的目的是抽象的目标澄清nonpulmonary静脉焦点的影响(NPVF)心房颤动(房颤)?后肺静脉(PV)隔离。NPVF是考虑的因素光伏隔离后房颤复发,但他们确切作用尚不清楚。回顾了216名患者(阵发性房颤,n ?第二个电生理研究6个月在最初的光伏隔离。复发接受额外的消融程序连接光伏和NPVF。检测对照组和药物输液(异丙肾上腺素或异丙肾上腺素在第一次和三磷酸腺苷)第二个过程。在第二个会话时间定义为新发展,及其对房颤复发的影响在第二次过程研究,随着NPVF的预测因素发展。第一阶段会议结束后明显更高的连接光伏(91.5%比68.2% ?病人没有复发)。在20和54病人在第一和第二分别会话。开发NPVF明显更高的房颤复发(24.1% vs . 7.4%的患者吗?新开发NPVF)。第一次会议后房颤复发独立后房颤复发的预测因素第二个过程,而历史和NPVF房颤在第一个会话中?新开发的NPVF。检测和消融可能是重要的为了防止房颤的治疗选项复发?重复过程。省略了

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号