首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Clinical electrophysiology. >Safety and Efficacy of Exercise?Training?in?Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
【24h】

Safety and Efficacy of Exercise?Training?in?Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

机译:的安全性和有效性运动训练? ?心律转复除颤器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objectives In this study, the authors performed a meta-analysis of currently available comparative prospective studies to assess the efficacy and safety of exercise training in heart failure (HF) patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Background ICDs have been shown to improve survival in patients with HF. However, many patients with ICDs experience fear of shocks and avoid physical activity. Few data exist for efficacy and safety of exercise training in HF patients with ICDs. Methods Prospective parallel arm trials with control and exercise training groups that evaluated the efficacy of exercise training in patients with ICDs were included in the meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest were difference in the change in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (ml/kg/min) between exercise and control group and the likelihood of ICD shocks among exercise training compared with that among control participants on follow-up. Results We included study level data from 6 trials (5 randomized controlled trials and 1 nonrandomized controlled trial). In the pooled analysis, ICD patients undergoing exercise training had significant improvement in CRF (weighted mean difference: 1.98 ml/kg/min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 to 3.38). The likelihood of ICD shocks on follow-up was also significantly lower among exercise training than among control participants (pooled odds ratio: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.91). Conclusions Among patients with HF and ICD implantation, exercise training was associated with significant?improvement in CRF and lower likelihood of ICD shocks. Graphical abstract Display Omitted
机译:抽象的目标在这项研究中,作者执行目前的荟萃分析比较前瞻性研究来评估运动训练的临床疗效和安全性失败(高频)植入患者心律转复除颤器(ICD)。ICDs已被证明改善生存心力衰竭患者。ICDs体验恐惧的冲击,避免身体活动。高频运动训练的儿童患者。方法前瞻性平行臂试验控制和运动训练团体运动训练的效果评估ICDs患者中荟萃分析。心和肺的差异变化健身(CRF)(毫升/公斤/分钟)运动和之间对照组和ICD电击的可能性相比在运动训练中在后续控制参与者。包括研究水平6试验的数据(5随机对照试验和非随机化对照试验)。接受运动训练的患者明显改善CRF(加权平均数区别:1.98毫升/公斤/分钟;时间间隔(CI): 0.58 - 3.38)。ICD电击对后续也显著在运动训练中较低的控制参与者(集中优势比:0.47;0.24到0.91)。ICD植入,运动训练与重要呢?和更低的ICD电击的可能性。摘要显示省略

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号