...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Perplexing views on directive
【24h】

Perplexing views on directive

机译:令人费解的意见指令

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The editorial on the European WorkingTime Directive was one sided, inaccurate, and at odds with a similar article published in BMJ Career Focus two months previously.Doctors have always been paid a basic salary for a 40 hour week or 10 sessions. In 2002 pay banding in the new contract showed that most junior doctors were working many more hours than their contracts. Only then did it become more costly for a trust to employ doctors for long hours than to employ more doctors for shorter hours.
机译:这篇社论在欧洲WorkingTime指令是片面的,不准确,格格不入与类似的文章发表在BMJ的事业关注两个月以前。支付基本工资40小时一周或10会话。显示,大多数初级医生的工作很多更多的时间比他们的合同。成为信托雇佣医生更加昂贵长时间比雇佣更多的医生较短的工作时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号