...
【24h】

Cuts

机译:削减

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Economist John Appleby observes that if the NHS were not protected from the UKgovernment's forthcoming spending cuts, it would have to reduce its budget by around 14%overthe next few years (p 372). A 30% real pay cut for all staff, non-provision of drugs, sacking all consultants and general practitioners, or abolishingthe NHS eitherin London orin Scotland and Wales-any of these could deliver such savings. But none, he admits wryly, would be very appealing, and even if less drastic cuts were made across the board these would be highly unpopular with the NHS-loving British public. Yet David Hunter, professor of health policy and management, argues against ringfencing the health budget (p 372): he believes that protectingthe NHS atthe expense of other public spending will hamper efforts to reduce social inequalities and prevent disease.
机译:经济学家John Appleby指出,如果NHS没有保护UKgovernment的吗即将到来的削减开支,它必须接下来的一些的预算减少14%左右年(372页)。non-provision药物,解雇所有顾问和全科医生,或者abolishingthe NHS欧林的苏格兰和Wales-any eitherin伦敦这些可以提供储蓄。承认挖苦道,很有吸引力,甚至如果不大幅削减了这将是非常不受欢迎的NHS-loving英国公众。卫生政策与管理、教授认为对保护卫生预算(372页):他相信protectingthe NHS牺牲的利益其他公共支出将阻碍努力减少社会不平等和预防疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号