...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study
【24h】

Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study

机译:充足的作者的回复提出批评在电子信件编辑:队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY QUESTION Is substantive criticism in letters to the editor, defined as a problem that could invalidate the research or reduce its reliability, adequately addressed by the authors? SUMMARY ANSWER Authors responded to substantive criticism in only about half of the cases. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHATTHIS PAPER ADDS Letters to the editor about research papers serve a useful role as post publication peer review and for the advancement of science. Editors should encourage authors to respond adequately-for example, by making a contract between the author and journal on acceptance of an article.
机译:研究问题是实质性的批评信编辑器中,定义为一个可能的问题使研究或减少其无效可靠性,作者充分解决的?总结作者对实质性的回答在只有一半的情况下批评。是已知的和滥交纸添加字母吗编辑对论文提供一个有用的角色文章出版同行审查和科学进步。作者充分反应的例子作者和期刊之间的契约在接受一篇文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号