...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-effectiveness of the addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy in first-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a population-based observational cohort in British Columbia, Canada.
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of the addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy in first-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a population-based observational cohort in British Columbia, Canada.

机译:成本效益的利妥昔单抗切化疗一线治疗弥漫型大b细胞淋巴瘤基于观察队列在英国哥伦比亚,加拿大。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has primarily been treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and predisone (CHOP) chemotherapy since the 1970s. Recently, the addition of rituximab to CHOP (CHOP-R) has been found to improve survival and trial-based results have suggested that it is a cost-effective alternative to CHOP. OBJECTIVES: The objective in this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CHOP-R relative to CHOP in first-line treatment of DLBCL in a population-based setting in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: We created a patient-level simulation model describing potential pathways for DLBCL patients initiating treatment with either CHOP or CHOP-R. Model parameters were populated with statistical analyses of individual-level treatment and effectiveness data and published cost estimates. All results were stratified by age at treatment initiation (/=60 years). The base-case scenario was based on a 15-year time horizon and a 3% discount rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. All costs are reported as 2006 Dollars CDN. RESULTS: For the base-case scenario, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for younger individuals ranged from Dollars 11,965 per disease-free life-year gained to Dollars 19,144 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. For older individuals, estimated ICERs for all health outcomes were below Dollars 10,000 per unit outcome gained for a 15-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Using population-based data, CHOP-R was found to be a cost-effective alternative to CHOP, particularly for individuals aged 60 years and older. Results from this Canadian observational data source were consistent with international clinical trial-based studies. The use of CHOP-R as a first-line treatment for DLBCL is recommended, with respect to both clinical and cost-effectiveness.
机译:背景:弥漫型大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)主要是用环磷酰胺治疗,阿霉素、长春新碱和predisone(切)自1970年代以来化疗。的利妥昔单抗切(CHOP-R)发现改善生存和试行的结果表明,这是一个划算的切的替代品。本研究旨在评估成本效益CHOP-R相对切成一线的DLBCL治疗以人群为基础的设置在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省。患者的立场仿真模型描述潜在通路DLBCL患者启动治疗切或CHOP-R。参数填充统计个体层面的治疗和分析数据有效性和出版的成本估计。所有结果被年龄分层治疗启动( / = 60年)。基本情况场景是基于一个15年的时间地平线和3%的贴现率。灵敏度分析。CDN报告为2006美元。基本情况的情况下,增量成本效益比率(警察)年轻个人从11965美元不等无病生命年上涨到19144美元每质量调整生命年。个人,估计警察都健康结果都低于10000美元每单位结果获得了15年时间。结论:使用人群为基础的数据,CHOP-R被发现是一个性价比不错的备用方案切,尤其是个人60岁及以上。观测数据来源是一致的国际临床试行的研究。使用CHOP-R DLBCL的一线治疗建议,对临床和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号