首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Chronic Hepatitis B Treatment: The Cost-Effectiveness of Interferon Compared to Lamivudin e
【24h】

Chronic Hepatitis B Treatment: The Cost-Effectiveness of Interferon Compared to Lamivudin e

机译:慢性乙型肝炎治疗:干扰素相比的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation from the perspective of the Brazilian National Health System of alternatives strategies (i.e., conventional interferon, pegylated interferon, and lamivu-dine) for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B who present elevated aminotransferase levels and no evidence of cirrhosis at the beginning of treatment. Methods: A Markov model was developed for chronic hepatitis B (hepatitis B antigen e HBeAg positive and negative) with 40 years' time horizon. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5. Annual rates of disease progression, costs due to complications, and the efficacy of medicines were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated uncertainties. Results: For HBeAg positive patients, peginterferon (48 weeks) resulted in an increase of 0.21 discounted life-years gained compared to interferon (24 weeks). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) converted to US dollars using the 2009 purchasing power parity conversion factor was US$100,752.24 per life-year gained. For HBeAg negative patients, it was observed that interferon (48 weeks) compared with long-term lamivudine presented an increase of 0.45 discounted life-years gained and ICER of US$15,766.90 per life-year gained. In the sensitivityanalysis, the ICER was more sensitive to variation in the probability of transition from chronic hepatitis B to compensated cirrhosis, discount rate, and medicine prices. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for HBeAg positive (pegylated interferon vs. conventional interferon) and negative (conventional interferon vs. lamivudine) showed that conventional interferon was cost-effective until three times the gross domestic product per capita. Conclusions: For patients with chronic hepatitis B with elevated aminotransferase levels in the pretreatment and no cirrhosis who were HBeAg positive, pegylated interferon (48 weeks) provided more life-years gained when compared to conventional interferon (24 weeks), and the ICER surpasses the country's buying power, which makes conventional interferon the chosen alternative. For HBeAg negative patients, conventional interferon (48 weeks) compared to lamivudine provided more life-years gained at a favorable ICER.
机译:目的:进行成本效益从巴西的角度评价国家卫生系统的选择策略(例如,传统的干扰素,聚乙二醇干扰素和lamivu-dine)治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者转氨酶水平升高,没有证据肝硬化的治疗的开始。方法:慢性的马尔可夫模型的开发乙型肝炎(乙肝抗原e (e抗原)积极的和消极的),40年的时间地平线。5%。由于并发症的疗效从文献获得的药品。单向和概率敏感性分析评估的不确定性。阳性患者,干扰素(48周)导致增加了0.21折扣比干扰素(24所获得周)。(冷藏工人)转换为使用2009美元购买力平价换算因子每个生命年100752 .24点获得美元。消极的患者,观察到干扰素(48周)而长期拉米夫定提出增加0.45所获得折扣和冷藏工人每个生命年15766 .90美元。sensitivityanalysis,冷藏工人更加敏感变化的过渡的可能性从慢性乙型肝炎补偿肝硬化、折现率和药品价格。成本效益为e抗原可接受性曲线积极的(聚乙二醇干扰素与传统干扰素)和负(传统的干扰素比拉米夫定)表明,传统干扰素是划算的,直到三次人均国内生产总值(gdp)。结论:慢性肝炎患者B的转氨酶水平升高预处理和肝硬化e抗原积极的,聚乙二醇干扰素(48周)提供了更多的寿命相比传统的干扰素(24周),和冷藏工人超越国家的购买力,使传统的干扰素备选方案。e抗原阴性的患者,常规干扰素(48周)相比,拉米夫定提供了更多的寿命得到了有利的冷藏工人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号