...
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >The cost-effectiveness of different chemotherapy strategies for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS)
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness of different chemotherapy strategies for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS)

机译:的成本效益不同的化疗策略患者预后不良先进的结直肠癌(MRC聚焦)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To assess the value for money of alternative chemotherapy strategies for managing advanced colorectal cancer using irinotecan or oxaliplatin, either in sequence or in combination with fluorouracil. Methods: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using data from the UK fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and CPT11 (irinotecan) use and sequencing (FOCUS) trial. The analysis adopted the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Input parameters were derived using a system of risk equations (for probabilities), count data regression models (for resource use), and generalized linear models (for utilities). Parameter estimates were obtained using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, propagating the simulation values through the state-transition model to characterize appropriately the joint distributions of expected cost, survival and quality-adjusted life years for each treatment strategy. An acceptability frontier was used to represent the probability that the optimal option is cost-effective at different values of the cost-effectiveness threshold. Results: The base-case analysis used drug unit costs provided by a typical English hospital. First-line doublet therapy combination therapy fluorouracil (5FU) plus irinotecan was the most cost-effective strategy at standard thresholds, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £14,877 (pound sterling) compared with first-line 5FU until treatment failure followed by single agent irinotecan. Other strategies were all subject to extended dominance. A sensitivity analysis using published drug (list) prices found the most cost-effective strategy would be first-line fluorouracil until failure followed by 5FU plus irinotecan (ICER: £19,753). Conclusions: The combination of 5FU and irinotecan (whether used first or second line) appears to be more cost-effective than the single agent sequential therapies used in the FOCUS trial, or 5FU plus oxaliplatin.
机译:目的:评估的价值替代化疗策略来管理使用伊立替康或先进的结肠直肠癌铂,在序列或组合氟尿嘧啶。模型被开发使用数据来自英国氟尿嘧啶、铂和CPT11(伊立替康)使用和测序(焦点)试验。采用英国国民健康的角度服务。风险方程组(概率),资源使用统计数据回归模型(),和广义线性模型(公用事业)。使用马尔可夫参数估计得到链蒙特卡罗方法,传播模拟值通过状态转换关系模型来描述适当的联合分布的预期成本,生存和每个治疗质量调整生命年策略。代表的概率最优选择是有效的在不同的值成本效益阈值。基本情况分析使用药物提供单位成本由一个典型的英国医院。疗法联合治疗氟尿嘧啶(5 fu)加伊立替康是最划算的标准阈值策略,增量成本效益比率(冷藏工人)相比一线£14877(英镑)5 -氟尿嘧啶治疗失败之前单一紧随其后代理伊立替康。扩展的优势。分析使用发表药物(列表)价格发现最具成本效益的战略一线氟尿嘧啶直到失败之后5 fu +伊立替康(冷藏工人:£19753)。5 -氟尿嘧啶的组合和伊立替康(是否使用第一或第二行)似乎更多成本效益比单一代理顺序疗法用于重点试验,或5 fu +铂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号