首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Reviewing the cost-effectiveness of endocrine early breast cancer therapies: Influence of differences in modeling methods on outcomes
【24h】

Reviewing the cost-effectiveness of endocrine early breast cancer therapies: Influence of differences in modeling methods on outcomes

机译:检查内分泌的成本效益早期乳腺癌的治疗方法:的影响不同建模方法的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review is primarily to identify published cost-effectiveness analyses and cost-utility analyses of endocrine therapies for the treatment of early breast cancer. A secondary objective is to identify whether differences in seven modeling characteristics are related to differences in outcome of these cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed full economic evaluations of endocrine treatments of early breast cancer published in the English language between 2000 and December 2010. Information from these publications was abstracted regarding outcome, quality, and modeling methods. Results: We identified 20 economic evaluations comprising 5 different endocrine therapeutic strategies, which are all assessed more then once. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the reported outcomes varied widely for identical therapies. For anastrazole compared to tamoxifen, incremental life-years gained even ranged from 0.16 to 0.550 with an ICER ranging from ?3,958 to ?75,331. Incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained ranged from 0.092 to 0.378 with a cost per QALY gained varying from ?3,696 to ?120,265. These large differences in outcome were related to different modeling methods, with differences in time horizon and use of a carryover effect as most prominent causes. Conclusion: Despite similar comparators and logical differences due to transferability issues, the outcomes of the included studies varied widely. To increase comparability and transparency of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, standardization of modeling methods for different therapeutic groups/diseases and the availability of a detailed and complete description of the model used in the evaluation is advocated. Recommendations for standardization in modeling treatment strategies in early breast cancer are presented.
机译:目的:本系统评价的目的主要是确定发表成本效益分析和成本效用分析内分泌疗法治疗早期乳腺癌。确定是否差异七建模相关特征的差异这些成本效益和结果成本效用分析。文献综述进行了识别同行评议的完整的经济评估早期乳腺癌的内分泌治疗在英语在2000年出版2010年12月。出版物是关于抽象的结果,质量和建模方法。确定20经济评价包括5不同的内分泌治疗策略,都是评估超过一次。成本效益比率(警察)的报道结果相差很大,相同的治疗。对于anastrazole与他莫昔芬相比,增量所获得甚至不等3958年与一个冷藏工人从0.16到0.550 ?75331年?。(提升)获得了从0.092到0.378不等每QALY成本上涨不同? 3696120265年?。与不同的建模方法不同的时间范围和使用翘尾因素作为最重要的原因。结论:尽管相似的比较器和逻辑差异由于可转让性问题,包括研究的结果相差很大。透明度pharmacoeconomic评估,标准化建模方法的不同治疗组/疾病和可用性详细而完整的描述模型中使用的评价是提倡的。推荐的标准化建模早期乳腺癌的治疗策略提出了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号