首页> 外文期刊>Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society >Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block
【24h】

Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block

机译:急性双心脏血流动力学的影响再同步治疗右束支块

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundControversy remains regarding the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Moreover, little is known about acute hemodynamic changes with CRT in this subgroup as compared with patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute biventricular hemodynamic response of CRT and other pacing configurations, including the effects of atrioventricular (AV) delay and atrial pacing, to understand the effects of CRT in RBBB. MethodsForty patients (9 with RBBB and 31 with LBBB) undergoing CRT implantation underwent temporary pacing with varying configurations and AV delay. The acute hemodynamic response was assessed via invasive measurements of dP/dtmax(maximal rate of change in pressure) in the left ventricle (LV) as well as the right ventricle (RV) in patients with RBBB. ResultsPatients with LBBB had a greater LV dP/dtmaxresponse to CRT than did patients with RBBB. In patients with RBBB, single- or dual-site RV pacing configurations resulted in greater increases in RV dP/dtmaxthan did biventricular pacing. Optimal AV delays that maximized RV dP/dtmaxwere shorter than optimal AV delays for LV dP/dtmax. Furthermore, AV delays chosen to maximize improvement in RV dP/dtmaxfrequently resulted in negative effects on LV dP/dtmax. ConclusionThese findings demonstrate a complex relationship between pacing configuration, AV delay, and hemodynamic responses. The biventricular hemodynamic response in patients with heart failure with RBBB might be improved by optimizing pacing modalities and AV delays. This may be particularly important in patients with diseases in whom RV failure predominates, such as patients with pulmonary hypertension and LV assist device.
机译:关于使用BackgroundControversy依然心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)心力衰竭患者正确的包分支块(RBBB)和左心室的降低(LV)射血分数。关于急性血流动力学变化与CRT子群与患者相比了束支块(更多)。本研究旨在评估急性摘要CRT和血流动力学响应其他配置踱来踱去,包括影响房室延迟(AV)和心房节奏,了解CRT在RBBB的影响。MethodsForty患者(9 RBBB和31确诊)接受CRT植入接受临时用不同配置和节奏AV延迟。评估通过侵入性的测量dP / dtmax(最大压力变化率)左心室(LV)以及正确的在RBBB患者心室(RV)。ResultsPatients与更多更大的LVdP / dtmaxresponse CRT患者比RBBB。导致更大的房车踱步的配置增加房车dP / dtmaxthan双踱来踱去。dP / dtmaxwere比最优AV短延迟房车dP / dtmaxfrequently最大化提高在LV dP / dtmax造成负面影响。ConclusionThese结果演示一个复杂节奏关系配置,AV延迟,和血流动力学响应。摘要病人血流动力学反应与心脏衰竭RBBB可能提高优化节奏模式和AV延迟。患者可能特别重要疾病在房车失败谁主导,如肺动脉高压患者和LV协助设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号