Objectivity of the peer-review process: Enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies

摘要

Key points The 'replication crisis' in science raises serious questions about the objectivity and reliability of the peer-review process. Much of the literature, contributed on the topic in the past by former editors, has focused on the role of reviewers, and their possible biases. However, experience in practice shows that editors also contribute significantly, at different levels, to the lack of objectivity of peer-review. Various techniques, including network analysis and machine learning, can be implemented to remedy the situation and restore the gatekeeping role of peer review.