...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Value of first‐trimester ultrasound in prediction of third‐trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome
【24h】

Value of first‐trimester ultrasound in prediction of third‐trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome

机译:第一次量三个月超声预测的价值第三还是三个月胎盘的超声阶段增生谱系障碍和手术结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Objectives To explore whether early first‐trimester ultrasound can predict the third‐trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder and to elucidate whether combining first‐trimester ultrasound findings with the sonographic stage of PAS disorder can stratify the risk of adverse surgical outcome in women at risk for PAS disorder. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from women with placenta previa, and at least one previous Cesarean delivery (CD) or uterine surgery, for whom early first‐trimester (5–7?weeks' gestation) ultrasound images could be retrieved. The relationship between the position of the gestational sac and the prior CD scar was assessed using three sonographic markers for first‐trimester assessment of Cesarean scar (CS) pregnancy, reported by Calí et al. (crossover sign (COS)), Kaelin Agten et al. (implantation of the gestational sac on the scar vs in the niche of the CS) and Timor‐Tritsch et al. (position of the center of the gestational sac below vs above the midline of the uterus), by two different examiners blinded to the final diagnosis and clinical outcome. The primary aim of the study was to explore the association between first‐trimester ultrasound findings and the stage of PAS disorder on third‐trimester ultrasound. Our secondary aim was to elucidate whether the combination of first‐trimester ultrasound findings and sonographic stage of PAS disorder can predict surgical outcome. Logistic regression analysis and area under the receiver‐operating‐characteristics curve (AUC) were used to analyze the data. Results One hundred and eighty‐seven women with vasa previa were included. In this cohort, 79.6% (95%?CI, 67.1–88.2%) of women classified as COS‐1, 94.4% (95%?CI, 84.9–98.1%) of those with gestational‐sac implantation in the niche of the prior CS and 100% (95%?CI, 93.4–100%) of those with gestational sac located below the uterine midline, on first‐trimester ultrasound, were affected by the severest form of PAS disorder (PAS3) on third‐trimester ultrasound. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, COS‐1 (odds ratio (OR), 7.9 (95%?CI, 4.0–15.5); P ??0.001), implantation of the gestational sac in the niche (OR, 29.1 (95%?CI, 8.1–104); P ??0.001) and location of the gestational sac below the midline of the uterus (OR, 38.1 (95%?CI, 12.0–121); P ??0.001) were associated independently with PAS3, whereas parity ( P ?=?0.4) and the number of prior CDs ( P ?=?0.5) were not. When translating these figures into diagnostic models, first‐trimester diagnosis of COS‐1 (AUC, 0.94 (95%?CI, 0.91–0.97)), pregnancy implantation in the niche (AUC, 0.92 (95%?CI, 0.89–0.96)) and gestational sac below the uterine midline (AUC, 0.92 (95%?CI, 0.88–0.96)) had a high predictive accuracy for PAS3. There was an adverse surgical outcome in 22/187 pregnancies and it was more common in women with, compared to those without, COS‐1 ( P ??0.001), gestational‐sac implantation in the niche ( P ??0.001) and gestational‐sac position below the uterine midline ( P ??0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, third‐trimester ultrasound diagnosis of PAS3 (OR, 4.3 (95%?CI, 2.1–17.3)) and first‐trimester diagnosis of COS‐1 (OR, 7.9 (95%?CI, 4.0–15.5); P ??0.001), pregnancy implantation in the niche (OR, 29.1 (95%?CI, 8.1–79.0); P ??0.001) and position of the sac below the uterine midline (OR, 6.6 (95%?CI, 3.9–16.2); P ??0.001) were associated independently with adverse surgical outcome. When combining the sonographic coordinates of the three first‐trimester imaging markers, we identified an area we call high‐risk‐for‐PAS triangle, which may enable an easy visual perception and application of the three methods to prognosticate the risk for CS pregnancy and PAS disorder, although it requires validation in large prospective studies. Conclusions Early first‐trimester sonographic assessment of pregnancies
机译:抽象的目标探索是否早期第一次量三个月超声可以预测第三阶段应承担的胎盘的超声阶段增生光谱(PAS)障碍和阐明是否结合第一阶段超声波与超声结果不是阶段障碍可以分层不良的风险手术结果在女性的风险不是障碍。前瞻性收集的数据分析前置胎盘的女性,至少一个以前剖腹产(CD)或子宫早期手术,为谁第一个三个月(5 - 7 ?检索。妊娠囊和CD之前疤痕评估使用三个超声标记第一次剖腹产疤痕(CS)的必经阶段评估怀孕,报道了卡利et al。(交叉号(COS)), Kaelin Agten et al .(植入疤痕妊娠囊的利基vsCS)和东帝汶Tritsch et al。(位置妊娠囊低于和高于的中心中线子宫),由两个不同考官最后诊断和失明临床结果。探索之间的联系第一个三个月超声发现和阶段没有障碍的第三阶段应承担的超声波。我们的次要目的是阐明是否结合第一阶段超声波发现和超声阶段不是障碍可以预测手术结果。在分析和区域接收机检测操作量特征曲线(AUC)被用来分析数据。几百八十7名女性与瓦萨号前置被包括在内。67.1 - -88.2%)的女性列为因为高1 94.4%(95% ?妊娠囊植入的利基之前CS和100% (95% ?与妊娠囊位于子宫的下面中线,在第一次怀孕应承担的超声波受到最严厉的形式不是障碍(PAS3)第三学期超声波。多元逻辑回归分析,因为量1(优势比(或),7.9 (95% ?& ? 0.001),移植的妊娠囊在利基(或者29.1 (95% ?& ? 0.001)和妊娠囊的位置低于中线子宫(或者38.1(95% ?与PAS3独立相关,而平价(P = ? 0.4)和cd之前的数量(0.5 P = ?)没有。数据诊断模型,第一次怀孕因为检测诊断1 (AUC, 0.94 (95% ?0.91 - -0.97)),妊娠植入的利基(AUC), 0.92 (95% ?囊下子宫中线(AUC), 0.92 (95% ?0.88 - -0.96))有较高的预测精度PAS3。怀孕和更常见的22/187的女性,比那些没有,因为量1 (P& ? 0.001),妊娠囊的植入利基(P & ? 0.001)和妊娠囊子宫位置低于中线(P& ? 0.001)。分析,第三还是三个月的超声诊断PAS3(黄金、4.3 (95% ?第一次怀孕诊断等因为量1(或者,7.9(95% ?植入的利基(或者29.1 (95% ?8.1 - -79.0);子宫中线以下(或6.6 (95% ?3.9 - -16.2);独立与不良的手术结果。结合超声的坐标一分之三必经阶段成像标记,我们发现一个区域我们称之为高危险作业不是三角形,这可能使一个简单的视觉感知和应用的三种方法为CS怀孕和预测风险不是障碍,尽管它需要验证大型前瞻性研究。第一次量三个月的超声评估怀孕

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号