...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Comparison of antral follicle count and serum anti‐Müllerian hormone level for determination of gonadotropin dosing in in‐vitro in‐vitro fertilization: randomized trial
【24h】

Comparison of antral follicle count and serum anti‐Müllerian hormone level for determination of gonadotropin dosing in in‐vitro in‐vitro fertilization: randomized trial

机译:比较窦的卵泡数和血清反缪氏激素水平测定在检测体外检测体外促性腺激素剂量施肥:随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation when gonadotropin dosing was determined based on antral follicle count (AFC) vs serum anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, in women undergoing in‐vitro fertilization (IVF) using the gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Methods This was a randomized double‐blind trial carried out in a university‐affiliated assisted reproduction unit. A total of 200 women undergoing their first IVF cycle using the GnRH‐antagonist protocol between April 2016 and February 2018 were randomized to determination of gonadotropin dosing based on either AFC or serum AMH level measured in the pretreatment cycle 1?month before the IVF cycle. Patients underwent IVF as per our center's standard protocol. The proportion of subjects achieving a desired ovarian response, defined as retrieval of six to 14 oocytes, was compared between the two study arms. Subgroup analysis of patients with baseline AFC ?5 and those with baseline AFC?≤?5 was performed. Concordance in AFC and AMH categorization between the pretreatment cycle and the ovarian‐stimulation cycle was assessed using Cohen's kappa ( κ ). Results There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving a desired ovarian response between the AFC (54%) and AMH (49%) groups ( P ?=?0.479). The median number of oocytes retrieved was nine vs seven ( P ?=?0.070), and the median follicular output rate was 0.54 vs 0.55 ( P ?=?0.764) in the AFC and AMH groups, respectively. Similar findings were observed on subgroup analysis of subjects with AFC?≤?5 and AFC??5 at the start of ovarian stimulation ( P ??0.05 for all comparisons). There was moderate concordance between AFC and AMH measured in the pretreatment cycle and the stimulation cycle ( κ ?=?0.478 and 0.587, respectively). Conclusion The proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation using the GnRH‐antagonist protocol is similar when the gonadotropin‐dosing algorithm used is based on AFC or serum AMH level. Copyright ? 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:摘要目的比较的比例女性实现所需的卵巢反应后卵巢刺激促性腺激素剂量确定基于窦的卵泡计数(亚)与血清抗缪氏应承担的激素(抗苗勒氏管激素)水平,在妇女接受人工受精(IVF)使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂协议。随机双盲试验进行大学附属辅助生殖单位。共有200名女性接受他们的第一个试管婴儿循环使用GnRH拮抗剂应承担协议之间2016年4月和2018年2月被随机分配促性腺激素剂量的确定依据亚足联或血清抗苗勒氏管激素水平来衡量的预处理周期1 ?根据我们中心的病人接受试管受精标准协议。实现所需的卵巢反应,定义为检索6至14卵母细胞,进行了比较两个研究之间的武器。患者基线亚足联在吗?基线亚足联≤?亚足联和抗苗勒氏管激素之间的分类预处理和卵巢刺激周期周期是评估使用科恩kappa(κ)。结果没有显著差异实现所需的病人的比例卵巢反应之间的亚足联(54%)和抗苗勒氏管激素(49%)组(P ? = 0.479)。卵母细胞获取九vs七(P0.070 = ?),和中值滤泡输出率为0.54和0.55 (P = ? 0.764)在亚足联和抗苗勒氏管激素组,分别。观察受试者的亚组分析亚足联≤?刺激(P ?在? 0.05比较)。有温和的亚足联和之间的一致性抗苗勒氏管激素预处理周期和测量刺激周期(κ? = 0.478和0.587,分别)。实现所需的卵巢反应之后卵巢刺激使用促性腺激素拮抗剂协议时相似的促性腺激素剂量算法是基于亚足联或血清抗苗勒氏管激素的水平。威利,

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号