...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35–37?weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non‐cephalic presentation
【24h】

Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35–37?weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non‐cephalic presentation

机译:常规超声检查的价值35-37吗?非必经头先露

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Objective Undiagnosed non‐cephalic presentation in labor carries increased risks for both the mother and baby. Routine pregnancy care based on maternal abdominal palpation fails to detect the majority of cases of non‐cephalic presentation. The aim of this study was to report the incidence of non‐cephalic presentation at a routine scan at 35?+?0 to 36?+?6?weeks' gestation and the subsequent management of such pregnancies. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in 45?847 singleton pregnancies that had undergone routine ultrasound examination at 35?+?0 to 36?+?6?weeks' gestation. Patients with breech or transverse/oblique presentation were divided into two groups; first, those who would have elective Cesarean section for fetal or maternal indications other than the abnormal presentation, and, second, those who would potentially require external cephalic version (ECV). The latter group was reassessed after 1–2?weeks and, if there was persistence of abnormal presentation, the parents were offered the option of ECV or elective Cesarean section at 38–40?weeks' gestation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine which of the factors from maternal and pregnancy characteristics provided a significant contribution in the prediction of, first, non‐cephalic presentation at the 35?+?0 to 36?+?6‐week scan, second, successful ECV from non‐cephalic to cephalic presentation, and, third, spontaneous rotation from non‐cephalic to cephalic presentation that persisted until delivery. Results First, at 35?+?0 to 36?+?6?weeks, the fetal presentation was cephalic in 43?416 (94.7%) pregnancies, breech in 1987 (4.3%) and transverse or oblique in 444 (1.0%). Second, multivariable analysis demonstrated that the risk of non‐cephalic presentation increased with increasing maternal age and weight, decreasing height and earlier gestational age at scan, was higher in the presence of placenta previa, oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios and in nulliparous than parous women, and was lower in women of South Asian or mixed racial origin than in white women. Third, 22% of cases of non‐cephalic presentation were not eligible for ECV because of planned Cesarean section for indications other than the malpresentation. Fourth, of those eligible for ECV, only 48.5% (646/1332) agreed to the procedure, which was successful in 39.0% (252/646) of cases. Fifth, the chance of successful ECV increased with increasing maternal age and was lower in nulliparous than parous women. Sixth, in 33.9% (738/2179) of pregnancies with non‐cephalic presentation in which successful ECV was not carried out, there was subsequent spontaneous rotation to cephalic presentation. Seventh, the chance of spontaneous rotation from non‐cephalic to cephalic presentation increased with increasing interval between the scan and delivery, decreased with increasing birth‐weight percentile, was higher in women of black than those of white racial origin, if presentation was transverse or oblique rather than breech and if there was polyhydramnios, and was lower in nulliparous than parous women and in the presence of placenta previa. Eighth, in 109 (0.3%) cephalic presentations, there was subsequent rotation to non‐cephalic presentation and, in 41% of these, the diagnosis was made during labor. Ninth, of the total 2431 cases of non‐cephalic presentation at the time of the scan, presentation at birth was cephalic in 985 (40.5%); in 738 (74.9%) this was due to spontaneous rotation and in 247 (25.1%) this was due to successful ECV. Tenth, prediction of non‐cephalic presentation at the 35?+?0 to 36?+?6‐week scan and successful ECV from maternal and pregnancy factors was poor, but prediction of spontaneous rotation from non‐cephalic to cephalic presentation that persisted until delivery was moderately good and this could be incorporated in the counseling of women prior to ECV. Conclusions The problem of unexpected non‐cephalic
机译:摘要目的未确诊的非头表现在劳动力增加的风险母亲和婴儿。根据产妇腹部触诊失败发现大多数情况下非头演示。非头先露时应承担的发病率常规扫描在35 + ?和这样的后续管理怀孕。前瞻性地收集数据的分析45 ?常规超声检查在35 + ?36 + ? 6 ?横向/斜表示被分成两组;剖腹产胎儿或孕妇适应症以外的异常表现,其次,那些潜在的需要外部头版本(ECV)。是1 - 2后重新评估吗?持久性的异常表现,父母提供的选项ECV或选修吗在38-40剖腹产吗?多变量逻辑回归分析的进行,以确定哪些因素从妊娠孕产妇和特征提供了一个重要的贡献的预测,首先,非头先露在35 + ?成功的ECV非头应承担的头演讲,第三,自发的旋转从非列车头头先露一直持续到交付。35 + ?在43头吗?1987年臀位(4.3%)和横向或斜444年(1.0%)。证明了非头应承担的风险表示孕产妇的增加而增加年龄和体重,降低高度和早些时候胎龄在扫描,是更高的前置胎盘、羊水过少或羊水过多和比怀孕的未生育过的女性,女性南亚或更低混合种族起源比白人女性。例非必经头先露的22%不合格的ECV因为剖腹产的计划部分以外的迹象先露异常。ECV,只有48.5%(646/1332)同意程序,这是成功的39.0%(252/646)的病例。成功的ECV孕产妇的增加而增加年龄和低比怀孕的未生育过的女性。与非头先露中成功的ECV没有开展,有随后的自发的旋转头演示。从非必经头旋转头表示随着时间的增加而增加之间的扫描和交付,降低增加出生量体重百分位数,是高来自黑人比白人种族的女性,如果表示是横向或斜臀位,如果有羊水过多是低比怀孕的妇女和未生育过的前置胎盘的存在。(0.3%)头报告,后续旋转非头先露, 41%的诊断在劳动。非必经头先露时扫描,表示在985年出生时是头(40.5%);自发的旋转和247年(25.1%)由于成功的ECV。非必经头先露在35 + ?36 + ?和怀孕的因素是穷,但是预测的自发的从非必经头旋转一直持续到头先露交货比较好,这可能是之前咨询的女性ECV。非列车头

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号