...
首页> 外文期刊>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Elective delivery at 34?weeks vs vs routine obstetric care in fetal gastroschisis: randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Elective delivery at 34?weeks vs vs routine obstetric care in fetal gastroschisis: randomized controlled trial

机译:在34个选修交货吗?产科护理在胎儿腹裂:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate whether elective preterm delivery (ED) at 34?weeks is of postnatal benefit to infants with isolated gastroschisis compared with routine obstetric care (RC). Methods Between May 2013 and September 2015, all women with a sonographic diagnosis of fetal gastroschisis referred to a single tertiary center, before 34?weeks' gestation, were invited to participate in this study. Eligible patients were randomized to ED (induction of labor at 34?weeks) or RC (spontaneous labor or delivery by 37–38?weeks, based on standard obstetric indications). The primary outcome measure was length of time on total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Secondary outcomes were time to closure of gastroschisis and length of stay in hospital. Outcome variables were compared using appropriate statistical methods. Analysis was based on intention‐to‐treat. Results Twenty‐five women were assessed for eligibility, of whom 21 (84%; 95%?CI, 63.9–95.5%) agreed to participate in the study; of these, 10 were randomized to ED and 11 to RC. The trial was stopped at the first planned interim analysis due to patient safety concerns and for futility; thus, only 21 of the expected 86 patients (24.4%; 95%?CI, 15.8–34.9%) were enrolled. Median gestational age at delivery was 34.3 (range, 34–36)?weeks in the ED group and 36.7 (range, 27–38)?weeks in the RC group. One patient in the ED group delivered at 36?weeks following unsuccessful induction at 34?weeks. Neonates of women who underwent ED, compared to those in the RC group, showed no difference in the median number of days on TPN (54 (range, 17–248) vs 21 (range, 9–465)?days; P ?=?0.08), number of days to closure of gastroschisis (7 (range, 0–15) vs 5 (range, 0–8)?days; P ?=?0.28) and length of stay in hospital (70.5 (range, 22–137) vs 31 (range, 19–186)?days; P ?=?0.15). However, neonates in the ED group were significantly more likely to experience late‐onset sepsis compared with those in the RC group (40% (95%?CI, 12.2–73.8%) vs 0%; P ?=?0.03). Conclusion This study demonstrates no benefit of ED of fetuses with gastroschisis when postnatal gastroschisis management is similar to that used in routine care. Rather, the data suggest that ED is detrimental to infants with gastroschisis. Copyright ? 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:摘要目的评估是否选修在34个早产(ED)吗?有利于婴儿与孤立的腹裂与常规产科护理(RC)。方法2013年5月到2015年9月女性胎儿的超声诊断腹裂指一个三级中心,在34 ?参与这项研究。被随机分配到埃德(引产术34 ?周)或RC(自发或分娩37-38吗?迹象)。的时间长度在全静脉营养(TPN)。腹裂和住院的长度。结果变量使用适当的比较统计方法。意图~治疗。评估为合格,其中21 (84%;95% ?研究;RC。临时分析由于病人安全问题徒劳的;86名患者(24.4%;登记。34.3(范围、34-36)?36.7(范围、27-38)?病人在ED组36交货吗?失败后感应34 ?周。新生儿的女性接受教育,相比那些RC组,显示没有区别平均天数在TPN(54(范围,17 - 248)对21(范围,9 - 465)?天;腹裂(7天关闭(范围、0-15)和5(范围、主?天;住院和长度(70.5(范围,22 - 137)和31(范围、19 - 186)?天;然而,在ED组新生儿明显更可能经历后期出现败血症而应承担的RC组(40% (95% ?? = 0.03)。ED的胎儿腹裂的受益产后腹裂管理类似用于日常保健。表明,婴儿的ED是有害的gastroschisis。由约翰·威利,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号