...
首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley journal of international law >NATO's Intervention in Kosovo and the Decision of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Not to Investigate: An Abusive Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion?
【24h】

NATO's Intervention in Kosovo and the Decision of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Not to Investigate: An Abusive Exercise of Prosecutorial Discretion?

机译:北约在科索沃的干预和决定国际刑事检察官法庭前南斯拉夫调查:一个虐待行使检察自由裁量权?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prosecutors will have to exercise their discretionary powers in total impartiality, avoiding the semblance of appearing on the side of the victors or the powerful. When the member states of NATO decided to initiate Operation Allied Force, few governments probably contemplated that they risked defending their actions before an international court. The increasing presence and importance of international courts appear to be the way of the future, whether one likes it or not. The ICTY [International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia] is one court before which NATO leaders will not have to appear. Although the Court clearly had jurisdiction, the prosecutor at the Court decided to follow the advice of the Committee that no formal investigation be initiated.
机译:检察官必须行使自由裁量权在总公正,避免出现的表面上胜利者或强大。北约决定发起行动盟军部队,政府可能很少考虑他们冒着捍卫自己行动在国际法院。增加的存在和重要性国际法庭的方式未来,不管你喜欢还是不喜欢。(国际刑事法庭前前南斯拉夫)是一个法院北约领导人将不会出现。显然,法院管辖,公诉人法院决定遵循的建议委员会没有正式调查启动。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号