...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology: Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology >Angiotensin 2 type 2 receptor activity and ischemic stroke severity.
【24h】

Angiotensin 2 type 2 receptor activity and ischemic stroke severity.

机译:血管紧张素2 2型受体活动缺血性中风严重性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Drugs that increase angiotensin 2 formation, including thiazides, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin 2 type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers, may be more effective in stroke prevention than angiotensin 2 suppressive drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether angiotensin 2 formation increasing drugs reduce incident stroke severity compared with angiotensin 2 formation suppressive drugs. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting within 24 hours of first-ever ischemic stroke over an 18-month period were studied. Subjects were only included if they were on only angiotensin 2 formation increasers, only angiotensin 2 formation suppressors, or no antihypertensive agents. NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at presentation was used as the index of stroke severity. Demographic data, risk factors, admission blood pressures, other medications, and stroke mechanisms were controlled for across the three groups using least absolute deviation linear regression. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five individuals met study criteria. Mean age was 67.4 years; 45% were women. Forty-nine patients were on angiotensin 2 formation suppressors and 16 on angiotensin 2 formation increasers. Age at admission, atrial fibrillation, previous antithrombotic use, cardioembolic and large-vessel atherosclerotic mechanisms, and mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significant univariate predictors of presenting median NIHSS score. On multivariate analysis, the adjusted median NIHSS score was lower in the angiotensin 2 increasers (median = 2.2; p = 0.005) and trended lower for angiotensin 2 suppressors (median = 4.4; p = 0.054) compared with the no-antihypertensive group (median = 6.0). There was no difference in stroke severity between angiotensin 2 increasers compared with angiotensin 2 suppressors (p = 0.123). CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin 2 formation increasing agents did not reduce ischemic stroke severity more than angiotensin 2 formation suppressing agents. However, the prestroke use of antihypertensives was associated with reduced severity of incident ischemic strokes.
机译:背景:药物,增加血管紧张素2形成,包括噻嗪类、钙通道受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素1型受体(AT1) 2拦截器,在中风可能更有效预防比血管紧张素2抑制药物如血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和β受体阻断剂。血管紧张素2形成增加药物减少事件中风严重性相比血管紧张素2形成抑制药物。方法:连续的病人中24小时在一个首次缺血性中风18个月的时间进行了研究。如果他们只包括血管紧张素2形成异径接头管,只有血管紧张素2形成抑制,或没有抗高血压代理。演讲作为中风的指数严重性。入院血压、其他药物中风的机制是在控制三组使用最小绝对偏差线性回归。七十五人符合研究标准。年龄是67.4岁;患者血管紧张素2的形成抑制血管紧张素2和16的形成异径接头管。颤,先前的抗血栓形成的使用,cardioembolic和粗血管动脉粥样硬化机制,意味着收缩压和舒张压压力是重要的单变量预测的中位数署得分。分析,调整署得分中值降低血管紧张素2增加者(值=2.2;2抑制(值= 4.4;no-antihypertensive集团(中位数=6.0)。血管紧张素2之间增加者相比血管紧张素2抑制(p = 0.123)。结论:血管紧张素2形成增加代理没有减轻缺血性中风严重性血管紧张素2形成压制代理。降压药与减少缺血性中风事件的严重性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号