...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ: British medical journal >Commentary: A reply to Ken Judge: mistaken criticisms ignore overwhelming evidence
【24h】

Commentary: A reply to Ken Judge: mistaken criticisms ignore overwhelming evidence

机译:评论:回复肯法官:错了批评忽视压倒性的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Despite Judge's highly personal focus, mine is far from being the only evidence of an association between national mortality rates and income distribution. The criticisms that Judge directs at two of my five demonstrations of the relation would therefore, even if they had been accurate, leave the bulk of the evidence unscathed. As well as summarising the evidence which Judge ignores, I shall also show why we should not be surprised at a relation between mortality and income distribution, and then deal with methodological problems that he inadvertently raises.
机译:尽管法官的高度个人的关注,我的远唯一一个关联的证据国家死亡率和收入之间的关系分布。在我的两个五示威活动的关系因此,即使他们已经准确,留下了大量的证据毫发无损。作为证据,法官忽略了总结,我还应当给我们不应感到惊讶的原因在死亡率和收入之间的关系分布,然后处理方法他无意中提出的问题。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号